‘No-Kill’ Policies Slowly Killing Animals 2016

When “no-kill” animal shelters and rescue groups are filled to capacity, which is almost always, they are left with two options: turn away more animals than they take in or warehouse animals, often in substandard, filthy, and severely crowded conditions, for weeks, months, or even years on end. Most, if not all, of the animals who are turned away from such facilities still face untimely deaths—just not at these facilities.

Instead they are cruelly killed by people who don’t want them, are dumped on roadsides and left to die from starvation or being hit by a car, or spend their short lives homeless, unwanted, and producing more litters of animals for whom no homes exist.

A tan dog sits next to an empty metal bowl

The lucky ones are taken to well-run open-admission animal shelters, where they either find a well-screened, permanent home or are painlessly euthanized in the arms of professionally trained, compassionate people. Here are some of the “no-kill” animal shelter failures that made headlines in recent years for making animals suffer a fate far worse than a kind death.

Reports Showing How ‘No-Kill’ Policies Harmed Animals in December 2016

New Brunswick, Canada

CBC.ca reported that a self-professed animal “rescue” group doing business as Hearts of the North had been accused of transporting dogs from shelters in the U.S. to homes in Canada, where several had attacked humans and their animal companions. There were also allegations of “discrepancies in paperwork accompanying dogs crossing the border.” Some veterinarians expressed concern that dogs who were sick with heartworm disease were being imported, as the disease could be spread to dogs and other animals in Canada.

St. Louis, Missouri

STLToday.com reported that a self-professed “no-kill” “rescue” doing business as Diana’s Grove Dog Rescue had asked the Humane Society of Missouri to remove approximately 165 dogs because it didn’t have enough revenue to house and care for the roughly 350 dogs in its custody. It was also reported that a pet store had ended its partnership with the “rescue” after a puppy from the facility died of pneumonia at the store. Additional complaints about the “rescue” may also have contributed to the end of the partnership. The “rescue” didn’t intend to close. However, FOX2now.com later reported that the “rescue” was closing and that its board members had resigned.

Locust Grove, Georgia

11Alive.com reported that a woman claiming to work with an “animal rescue organization” had left a dog in the custody of a pet sitter. More than a month later, the dog was allegedly found emaciated and confined to a crate in the rain outside the residence. The “rescuer” said she believed that the pet sitter had moved two weeks before the dog was found. A blind dog the pet sitter had adopted from a local animal shelter was also found without food or water, “stumbling” around the empty home. Authorities were investigating.

Hennepin County, Minnesota

StarTribune.com reported that the owner of a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Close to Home Canine Rescue, LLC, had been charged with burglary after being accused of breaking into a woman’s house and killing her dog. Witnesses told police that the “rescuer” had used a hidden key to enter the home while the owner was out of town and had taken the woman’s small dog to a park or wildlife refuge, where she killed him by stomping on him and/or drowning him.

Lincoln, Rhode Island

TurnTo10.com reported that state authorities had assessed a $63,000 fine against a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Broken Tail Foster & Rescue of RI. Investigators said that there were “too many dogs living in a dark, smelly facility” and alleged that the group had also exposed owned animals to deadly parvovirus by allowing them to enter the property while it was under quarantine. The basement of the group’s storefront was damp, lacked ventilation and natural light, and reeked of “a strong odor of urine and feces,” according to an investigator. Twenty-eight dogs were found at the property, where the organization was licensed to keep three. WoonsocketCall.com reported that the fine was $63,100 and that the “rescue” had also been ordered to surrender its operating license. The state veterinarian said that he could remember only “a couple of opportunities to assess penalties under the animal care penalties” and that the case was “one of the more egregious ones.” Inspection reports described a summer visit when one of the owners told inspectors that the air conditioner wasn’t being used “due to the expense of operating it.” During another inspection, a dog who had just had puppies was found in need of immediate veterinary care because of a life-threatening uterine infection.

Antioch, California

EastBayTimes.com reported that the Antioch Animal Services shelter would stop accepting animals from residents who could no longer care for them unless they had an appointment, citing chronic severe crowding. The city facility had previously removed outside cages where people could leave animals after hours.

Golden Valley, Arizona

News3LV.com reported that authorities had seized 20 animals from a self-professed animal “sanctuary” after it was deemed uninhabitable. One of the dogs was found covered with ticks, emaciated, severely anemic, and possibly needing a blood transfusion. Authorities suspected that four others were infected with valley fever, a fungal lung infection. DCourier.com reported that nearly 200 dogs had been found penned outdoors at the “sanctuary.” They were left in the care of volunteers at the property, which was doing business as the Rescued Unwanted Furry Friends Foundation. Describing conditions, the sheriff said, “Somewhere along the line it becomes overwhelming and the animals now become prisoners rather than being rescued.” JustSayNews.com reported that criminal cruelty-to-animals charges could result from an ongoing investigation by the sheriff’s office. During a meeting of the county board of supervisors, a supervisor said that “a litany of code violations has plagued the … operation for the past 14 years” and that the county had spent “tens of thousands” of dollars and “plenty of man-hours” on code compliance efforts at the “sanctuary.” 12News.com later reported that all of the “sanctuary’s” permits had been revoked and it had been shut down. Authorities had removed 130 dogs and 80 cats, and volunteers were working to find homes for some remaining animals. Some unsocialized 12-year-old dogs had been at the “sanctuary” their entire lives.

Clark County, Nevada

KTNV.com reported that authorities had seized 18 dogs from a self-professed animal “rescuer” who said that she had been acquiring dogs from “all over the country for 20 years.” They were found malnourished and emaciated. The property contained six times the number of dogs legally allowed at a private residence. The “rescuer” claimed that she had gotten “busy and overwhelmed.” Most of the dogs weren’t vaccinated, and many hadn’t been spayed or neutered. A later report revealed that the case was still under investigation.

Waterford, Pennsylvania

ErieNewsNow.com reported that a kitten had died and other cats weren’t able to eat and were struggling to breathe after a fire tore through a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as French Creek Animal Rescue. Because the cats were kept in plastic carriers with plastic litterboxes, a lot of black smoke was created when their cages began to melt. The fire was started when a kitten pulled a space heater cord into the carrier in which the animal was confined. The kitten died, and it wasn’t known how many cats would survive. “Dozens” of animals were reportedly in the building at the time.

DeKalb County, Georgia

FOX5Atlanta.com reported that a “[l]ongtime animal rescuer” had been arrested and charged with a felony count of cruelty to animals after authorities found neglected and starving animals at his property, which was used as a “foster home” for a group doing business as Friends of DeKalb Animals (FODA). The floors inside the home were “permeated” with dog urine and feces, and authorities removed about a dozen animals, including a potbellied pig with protruding ribs who was found in an outdoor pen and nothing but a plastic doghouse for shelter. One dog was found dead, and others were emaciated with “ribs [and] hip bones … clearly visible.” A spokesperson for FODA said that the group had not inspected the home and had left inspections up to the foster caregivers themselves. A court date was apparently set.

Concord Township, Ohio

FOX8.com reported that authorities had seized 133 of 262 cats housed at a self-professed “no-kill” shelter doing business as Caroline’s Kids Pet Rescue after they were found suffering from respiratory problems and painful dental diseases. News-Herald.com reported that more than 60 percent of the cats at the “shelter” suffered from untreated medical conditions. They were receiving treatment while the investigation remained ongoing.

Middletown, Ohio

Journal-News.com reported that authorities had seized 28 sick and injured cats from a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Heart’s Rescue Sanctuary and that its owner had failed to appear in court on six counts of cruelty to animals. The “rescue” was also being evicted because of past-due rent and property damage. An affidavit reportedly revealed that cats were found at the property “in awful conditions … [o]pen mouth breathing, barely moving, some were leaking stool and had discharge around the nose and eyes.” Five had to be euthanized because of the extent of their conditions. A new court date for a pretrial hearing was set.

Reports Showing How ‘No-Kill’ Policies Harmed Animals in November 2016

Davis County, Utah

KUTV.com reported that three dogs had been found abandoned inside a rented home after their owners, Shaleesa and Cody Luceros, were evicted. The couple told authorities that they had left the dogs because they couldn’t afford the fees required to surrender them to the county animal shelter. Authorities said that the animals “were extremely malnourished and emaciated” with protruding ribs. The home was littered with feces, urine, and empty bowls. On its website, the county animal shelter states that it charges $40 per dog in surrender fees and an additional $30 fee if help with transportation is needed. The Luceros each faced three counts of cruelty to animals, and the dogs were taken to the shelter.

Westchester County, New York

News12.com reported that a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Recycled Paws Rescue, Inc., had been accused of adopting out sick animals. Authorities reportedly confirmed that the owner of the “rescue” had outstanding civil penalties for operating without a permit in the past. They also said that she voluntarily surrendered 10 sick dogs during an investigation. The SPCA of Westchester told CBSLocal.com, “We’ve been receiving complaints against them for this for years. … And we are investigating.”

Pulaski Township, Pennsylvania

NCNewsOnline.com reported that a woman who “had been affiliated with animal rescue and foster groups” had been charged with two counts of cruelty to animals. One of the charges was for failing to provide two dogs and a cat with clean and sanitary shelter. She had allowed feces and urine to accumulate over an extended period of time. She was also charged for depriving the cat of food and water, causing the animal to become dehydrated and emaciated, and keeping two birds in “unclean and unsanitary shelter.” The woman was reportedly on probation at the time on similar charges from 2015 after a horse in her custody starved to death and two others were found emaciated. Dogs in her custody that year were found in a house in which feces covered the floor. In the 2015 case, she was also ordered to undergo a mental-health evaluation and was prohibited from keeping domestic animals while on probation.

Porter County, Indiana

ChicagoTribune.com reported that all area animal shelters and self-professed “rescues” were full, leaving more than 30 cats, some of whom were ill, with a woman who couldn’t care for them. She had reportedly taken them after finding them homeless. The county animal shelter had received two complaints about the condition in which the cats were living, but it was already housing 20 cats over its capacity. A spokesperson said that the shelter was turning away all cats, including homeless ones. Two kittens described as “the sickest” were taken to a veterinarian by a “rescue” group, but no shelter would accept the remaining animals. The cats’ owner was facing eviction.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Post-Gazette.com reported that authorities had seized more than 180 animals from the residence of a woman who told them that she had “rescued” them from people who no longer wanted them and gave them away via Craigslist. The animals included 150 birds (one of whom was dead), 14 ferrets (one of whom was ill), 10 cats, seven dogs, two geckos, a turtle, a bearded dragon, and a guinea pig. Conditions in the house were described as “beyond deplorable,” and ammonia levels were deemed unsafe for humans. Two women at the residence faced cruelty-to-animals charges and a charge of endangering the welfare of a child because a 12-year-old boy was living there. He was taken into protective custody.

Reports Showing How ‘No-Kill’ Policies Harmed Animals in October 2016

Bloomfield, New Jersey

EssexNewsDaily.com reported that an 11-year-old boy had required 81 stitches after being attacked by a pit bull adopted from a self-professed “no-kill” shelter doing business as Bloomfield Animal Shelter. Before being adopted, the dog had reportedly been confined at the shelter for approximately 10 months. After the attack, he was taken to a municipal animal shelter.

Michigan City, Indiana

SouthBendTribune.com reported that four cats had been abandoned in cardboard boxes outside the Michiana Humane Society & SPCA, which has restrictive surrender policies. A note found with the cats said that their owners could “no longer care for them.” A shelter spokesperson said that anonymous cat drop-offs were common at the shelter and that two hours after the four cats were found, two homeless cats brought to the shelter were turned away because of space limitations.

Pittsylvania County, Virginia

GoDanRiver.com reported that authorities had seized 31 cats from the residence of the vice president of a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Happy Tails Rescue. Five other cats couldn’t be captured. The carpet and floors of the residence were “soaked with urine and feces,” which could be smelled from outside. Child Protective Services was alerted because of the condition of the home and the presence of two children. A court banned the woman from keeping companion animals, and she was asked to resign from the “rescue.”

Madison County, Indiana

HeraldBulletin.com reported that authorities had seized 39 cats, three snakes, two dogs, two guinea pigs, a bearded dragon, a parrot, and a tarantula from a self-professed animal “rescuer” after they were found in “deplorable” conditions in a mobile home with three adults. Feces were found on the walls and floors of the home, and litterboxes were overflowing with waste. The “rescuer” had reportedly established online fundraising accounts to care for “rescued” animals. She was arrested on suspicion of animal neglect.

Vermillion County, Indiana

TribStar.com reported that authorities had seized 56 cats, 26 birds, and 10 dogs from a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Troll Keep Kitty Haven, Inc. The animals were found in poor condition at two modular homes at the property, which were condemned by a health inspector. Authorities began investigating after people who had adopted kittens from the “rescue” reported that the animals had experienced severe health problems. WTHITV.com later reported that three people had been arrested on cruelty-to-animals charges in connection with the case.

Pelham, New Hampshire

LowellSun.com reported that authorities had seized 18 dogs from a self-professed animal “rescuer” who had acquired them from animal shelters and “rescue” groups across the country. The animals were found in filthy crates at his residence without access to food or water. At least 15 additional dogs who had been given to the “rescuer” were unaccounted for. After an investigation began, more dogs who were traced to the “rescuer” were found abandoned in the area, including two who had allegedly been acquired from a “rescue” in Texas and were found wandering the streets of Nashua, New Hampshire, and four who were found abandoned in waste-filled cages in Sudbury, Massachusetts. Authorities seized one of those dogs because of open sores and wounds covering his or her body. The investigation was ongoing, and cruelty-to-animals charges were expected to be filed.

Knoxville, Tennessee

WBIR.com reported that 37 cats had been burned alive at a residence where they were being hoarded by a couple who said they had been “rescuing” cats for more than a year. Three additional cats survived after receiving oxygen treatment from fire crews.

Ferndale, Michigan

WXYZ.com reported that an animal shelter was caring for dozens of sick and injured cats and kittens who had been removed from the home of a self-professed animal “rescuer.” The animals were reportedly found in filthy cages in a hot and humid basement at the “rescuer’s” home. The residence was described as a “living hell” for the animals, who were suffering from infections, disease, and neglect. Some of the cats were so ill that they had to be euthanized, and some suffered from eye infections so severe that their eyes had to be surgically removed. The hoarder reportedly acquired cats and kittens from animal shelters in other states.

Callahan County, Texas

Star-Telegram.com reported that authorities had seized more than 200 live and two dead animals from a self-professed animal “sanctuary” doing business as AM Farmers Sanctuary. The animals included 162 dogs, 25 cats, seven donkeys, seven potbellied pigs, six goats, three rabbits, three reptiles, three ducks, and one rat. Conditions at the “sanctuary” were described as “deplorable,” and most of the animals were “noticeably sick.” More than 50 animals were found crammed into a single-wide trailer that was soaked in feces and urine, and “thousands of roaches” covered the walls. Ammonia levels in the trailer were said to be at “extremely dangerous levels.” Dogs and puppies were found in crowded pens outdoors, most without food or water, and the pasture areas for livestock were filled with debris, rusty nails, feces, and other hazards. Water troughs were filled with murky green water, and one contained a dead rat. A veterinarian who examined the animals “determined that these animals [had] failed to receive even the basics of general care.”

Cornwall, Ontario, Canada

CornwallFreeNews.com reported that a woman had claimed that a representative of the Ontario SPCA animal shelter told her that the facility didn’t have room to admit a homeless cat who was rescued from the streets and suggested that she re-abandon the animal. She was reportedly told that the shelter was only taking reservations to accept animals sometime during the following month.

M?kaha, Hawaii

KHON2.com reported that authorities had seized more than 270 dogs from a self-professed “no-kill” animal shelter doing business as Friends for Life. Animals were found in inhumane conditions, and many were thin or emaciated and suffering from skin conditions, including severe tick infestations. The owner was arrested on suspicion of second-degree cruelty to animals.

Lantry, South Dakota

ArgusLeader.com reported that a state judge had ordered two county governments to take control of an estimated 650 wild horses at a self-professed animal “sanctuary” doing business as the International Society for the Protection of Mustangs and Burros. The order followed a hearing in which the business reportedly recognized “that the herd has grown beyond a size that can be adequately cared for.” A veterinarian reportedly found a number of thin horses at the “sanctuary,” including some who were “nosing through the dried manure looking for remaining hay” and some with medical conditions and overgrown hooves. A state agency reportedly determined that “animal neglect is present at this facility.”

Austin, Texas

FOX7Austin.com reported that the Austin Animal Center was full and to maintain its “no-kill” status wasn’t accepting new animals. Citizens who found animals on the streets were being asked not to bring them in.

Highland County, Ohio

TimesGazette.com reported that the Highland County Humane Society, a self-professed “no-kill” shelter, was full and not accepting new animals. Staff reported frequently finding boxes of kittens and puppies outside as well as dogs who had been tied to the facility’s gate overnight.

Reports Showing How ‘No-Kill’ Policies Harmed Animals in September 2016

Sarasota, Florida

FOX13News.com reported that a woman who had adopted a dog from The Humane Society of Sarasota County (HSSC) told authorities that she didn’t return the animal, whom she couldn’t take care of, because she couldn’t afford the $30 surrender fee. Six months after he was adopted, she surrendered him to the county animal shelter, claiming that he was a stray. He was emaciated, and a microchip identified her as his owner. She told authorities that she had kept him in a crate and that she worked too much to be able to feed him or take him to a veterinarian. She was charged with cruelty to animals and confining an animal without sufficient food. The dog was returned to the HSSC.

Harlingen, Texas

BrownsvilleHerald.com reported that authorities had seized more than 60 dogs from a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Pick of the Litter Rescue Inc., after they were discovered in unsanitary conditions and the facility was found in violation of a local ordinance limiting the number of animals allowed at one residence. There were also accusations that the “rescue” had dogs up for adoption who were malnourished. The same “rescue” had reportedly been shut down just months earlier. Two of its operators were charged with cruelty to animals.

Phoenix, Arizona

ABC15.com reported that a man had claimed to have trapped around 400 cats on his property over a period of a “few years,” drove them 30 to 40 miles, and then re-abandoned them. He said he did so because his local animal shelter either wouldn’t accept them or said it would only sterilize them and return them to his property. He said the cats would urinate on trees, doorways, and tires on the property and he wanted to make sure they didn’t return.

New Iberia, Louisiana

KATC.com reported that authorities had cited the president of a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Special Needs Animal Rescue and Rehabilitation and seized four dogs found neglected at her home. An investigation was ongoing, and additional charges were pending. One of the dogs seized was a pit bull who had been “rescued” by the group three years earlier. He was found locked in a kennel knee-deep in mud, feces, and urine without food or water. Three other dogs were roaming at large. The sick dog was taken to a veterinarian and treated for inflammation and hair loss on his paws, an open sore, ringworm, and pododermatitis. A test revealed that he was also suffering from advanced heartworm disease. Authorities said he had also not been socialized and was “dangerously aggressive.” The woman reportedly had numerous online fundraising campaigns posted, which showed her asking for—and receiving—thousands of dollars in donations to “rescue” animals. She was allegedly voted out as president of the group.

Langley, British Columbia, Canada

CTVNews.ca reported that authorities had seized 45 dogs, 18 cats, five goats, five doves, five chickens, three ducks, three sheep, one rabbit, one quail, one turtle, and one potbellied pig from a self-professed “rescue” doing business as 1ataTime Rescue after they were found malnourished, emaciated, and suffering from severe periodontal disease and other medical conditions. Three more animals were found dead at the property. One dog’s tooth fell out during an examination, and a paralyzed dog had to be euthanized after a veterinarian determined that it was the only option to relieve his “extreme suffering.” According to an official, the dog “had an ulcerated sore from only being able to lie on one side and he was only able to move one limb.” Many animals were found in crates in the home exhibiting stereotypic behavior, including repetitive pacing. The same “rescue” had reportedly been evicted for not paying rent in 2012, resulting in the seizure of 52 dogs and 19 cats. A dead cat was also seized at that time. It wasn’t reported if criminal charges were being considered.

San Antonio, Texas

ExpressNews.com reported that authorities had seized 54 animals—including 35 dogs, six chickens, four cats, and one parrot—from a self-professed animal “rescuer” who said she was operating as a foster home for other groups. Animals were found in “varying health conditions,” and several were found inside cramped crates. A hazmat team said that ammonia levels in the residence were “dangerously high,” requiring animal service workers to wear specialized respirators during the raid. Four dead animals were also found at the property. Criminal charges were being considered.

Milford, Connecticut

Connecticut.News12.com reported that the former director of the SPCA of Connecticut had been sentenced to one year in prison after being convicted of cruelty to animals. The charges were brought after dogs were found at two properties “in terrible conditions.” (See the August 2016/Monroe, Connecticut, entry.) He was ordered to spend three years on probation following the prison term, during which time he would not be allowed to own animals or work with any animal groups. 

Madera, California

ABC30.com reported that authorities had seized more than 25 dogs from a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Love Me, Don’t Leave Me Rescue, Inc., after they were discovered in small crates without access to food or water. The crates were found outdoors. “Had about an inch full of feces [the animals] were wallowing in, no shade, no nothing—it was awful,” said a county official. The “rescue” reportedly claimed to be a nonprofit, going so far as providing a fake Federal Employer Identification Number on a social media page. An investigation was ongoing. 

Geauga County, Ohio

Ohio.com reported that authorities had seized 15 dogs from a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Cleveland Area No-Kill Dog Rescue and Training Center after they were found in “deplorable” conditions, abandoned in crates at a property in 90-degree heat. Authorities said that records that documented how training was provided and how monetary donations were recorded and used by the business had not been found. An investigation was ongoing.

Racine, Wisconsin

JournalTimes.com reported that authorities had seized 26 dogs from a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Lucky Mutts Rescue, Inc. The animals were reportedly found confined to crates stacked on top of each other, many too small for the dogs held inside. A responding officer was reportedly so overwhelmed by the strong odor of urine that he couldn’t stay in the residence for more than 30 seconds. Previous complaints against the “rescue” included a buildup of feces in the backyard and housing a dog in a van parked in the driveway for days during the summer. The “rescue” owner and her boyfriend were charged with 26 counts of intentionally or negligently mistreating animals. 

Yukon, Oklahoma

NewsOK.com reported that a self-described “no-kill” shelter doing business as Pets and People Humane Society had been accused of hoarding animals—some for years on end—in cruel conditions that included keeping them in cages too small for them for up to 23 hours a day. The facility, which reportedly consisted of several ramshackle buildings and a handful of gravel yards and pens, was reportedly hoarding 406 animals in a facility designed for 100. Cages were stacked nearly to the ceiling in every room, including a laundry room. A reporter who toured the facility saw “two rooms where dogs could be seen spinning nonstop in their cages while others bit at the steel doors.” He said that some “sat and stared blankly amid the cacophony of barking, howling and whelping.” A volunteer said that some dogs had been kept in cages inside dark closets and that some had been at the facility for their entire lives. A former worker said that some had been there for as many as nine years. 

Anchorage, Alaska

KTVA.com reported that authorities had fined Coshok’s Canine Castle, managed by the executive director of Alaska Animal Rescue Friends, for animal-care and sanitation violations. Video footage taken at the facility reportedly showed dogs in stacked crates, many without water, and some in cages that were too small for them. Some of the dogs were standing in their own waste, while others reportedly showed signs of injury. Authorities had received 47 complaints in the previous three years, resulting in three notices to comply and three notices of violation, which came with fines. Concerns about the group’s financial paperwork were also raised. 

Long Beach, California

PressTelegram.com reported that a veterinarian’s license had been revoked after he performed repeated unnecessary surgeries on a cat whose face was being eaten away by cancer. He did so at the instruction of a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Furrever Grateful Rescue (FGR). After the failed surgeries, FGR took the cat to another veterinarian, who recommended euthanasia to end his suffering. FGR refused and instead took the cat to a warehouse where the animal was caged as he continued to suffer and decline. FGR was reportedly using the cat as a fundraising tool by posting photos of his decline on its social media pages. Authorities intervened, and the cat was eventually put out of his misery. 

North Little Rock, Arkansas

KATV.com reported that authorities had seized more than a dozen dogs from a warehouse where they were being kept in poor conditions by a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Southern Paws Transport. A worker was cited for having too many dogs and not having a permit to operate an animal establishment. She reportedly pleaded no contest to the citations, including one citing poor conditions in which the dogs were being held.

Reports Showing How ‘No-Kill’ Policies Harmed Animals in August 2016

Wilson County, North Carolina

WilsonTimes.com reported that the owner of a self-professed “no-kill” shelter doing business as For the Love of Dogs, Inc., had been arrested after refusing to return a dog to his owner because she wouldn’t pay him $100. He was charged with keeping stray animals without notifying the sheriff’s department, a violation of the county’s animal control ordinance. Authorities seized the dog and returned him to his owner.

Tuscaloosa County, Alabama

ABC3340.com reported that the Tuscaloosa Metro Animal Shelter had temporarily stopped accepting animals—including four puppies whom an elderly couple had rescued from extreme temperatures outdoors and couldn’t afford to keep or care for—in an effort to reduce euthanasia statistics at the facility. According to the news site, if residents find a homeless animal in need, “it’s considered your responsibility.”

Robertson County, Tennessee

Tennessean.com reported that the Robertson County Animal Control shelter was turning away cats and dogs in an effort to reduce euthanasia at the facility. Approximately 60 cats and an unspecified number of dogs were reportedly placed on a waiting list and left with people who no longer wanted them or couldn’t provide them with adequate care.

Van Buren, Arkansas

5NewsOnline.com reported that authorities had removed 40 to 50 animals from a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Shana’s Last Chance Dog Rescue. The owner of the “rescue” had reportedly asked them to remove the animals because she couldn’t provide them with adequate care. Some of the animals had skin diseases and wounds, apparently from fighting.

Santa Fe, New Mexico

ABQJournal.com reported that a self-professed “dog lover” who had wanted to start an animal “rescue” facility was on trial after being charged with 22 counts of cruelty to animals and one count of practicing veterinary medicine without a license. The charges were filed after authorities seized 48 dogs from her property, where they had to wear hazmat suits and respirators because of the strong odor created by feces that covered “every corner of the double-wide trailer … including the kitchen counter.” Some dogs had difficulty standing and were found “bang[ing] their heads against the floor and wall.” Others had wounds from fighting.

Orange Cove, California

ABC30.com reported that authorities had seized more than 140 animals from a self-professed “no-kill” animal shelter doing business as Noah’s Friends Animal Sanctuary. Animals were found at the “sanctuary” without access to food or water, malnourished, and in need of medical treatment. YourCentralValley.com reported that apparently untreated medical conditions included tumors, eye infections, and skin lesions. Details of the case were to be submitted to the district attorney.

Perry, Michigan

Freep.com reported that authorities had seized more than 100 cats from a self-professed “no-kill” animal “rescue” doing business as the Cat Project, Inc. Authorities also condemned the building at the property, where the odor was described as “unbelievable.” WLNS.com reported that around 120 cats were found roaming the property, some in poor health, and that several neighbors said they had been complaining for more than a year about poor conditions and foul odors at the property. An investigation was ongoing.

Bluffton, Ohio

LimaOhio.com reported that authorities had seized 70 dogs and cats from a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as TLU Rescue. Animals were found living amid their own waste in cages with maggot-infested food. Ammonia levels from the accumulation of feces and urine at the “rescue” were so high that authorities had to wear face masks during the raid. One dog died after the raid, and a criminal case was reportedly being prepared for submission to the prosecutor’s office.

Las Vegas, Nevada

KTNV.com reported that law-enforcement officials had opened a criminal investigation into conditions at a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Adopt A Rescue Pet, where dogs were allegedly confined 24/7 to stacked cages or concrete kennels and denied needed care. A former employee said that the “rescue” was warehousing “dogs [who] are either unadoptable or old or sick,” including one who was unable to stand and had developed sores from lying on concrete and another who had sustained wounds from flea, fly, and mite bites. Authorities had reportedly found repeated violations of minimal animal-care standards, including strong odors, severely crowded cages, dogs forced to stand on bare wire, a lack of available drinking water, poor nutrition, and inadequate housing, veterinary care, exercise, and socialization.

Contra Costa County, California

KTVU.com reported that in a push “to find homes for as many dogs as possible,” the Contra Costa County Animal Services shelter had released at least two dangerous dogs. The same day that she was adopted, one dog attacked and killed a small dog named Teddy who was being walked on a leash by his guardian. Teddy sustained massive injuries to his sternum and ribs. There was too much internal damage even to take an X-ray, and he had to be euthanized. His guardian was also badly bitten while trying in vain to rescue him. Another dog attacked and severely injured his new guardian the day after he was adopted. An earlier report on that incident revealed that the adopter was sent to the hospital after sustaining “deep slashes” and puncture wounds that required 30 stitches. The shelter’s veterinary medical director said that the dog was so aggressive that staff couldn’t perform a medical examination before his adoption and that it’s “a trend he fears has become more common in shelters, as they are judged by their ‘live release’ rates and success at achieving ‘no kill’ status.”

Mojave, California

KernGoldenEmpire.com reported that authorities had seized 46 cats from a self-professed “no-kill” shelter doing business as Save-a-Life No-Kill Animal Shelter after they were found underweight, in poor health, and with “infectious oozing” coming from their noses and mouths. Approximately 200 cats were reportedly left at the property. Authorities called it an “ongoing situation” and said they planned to continue to monitor conditions.

Fairfax County, Virginia

WUSA9.com reported that in an effort to maintain a “positive placement” rate, the Fairfax County Animal Shelter had adopted out dogs who were a risk to public safety, including ones who had bitten shelter caretakers and/or previous guardians (some of them multiple times) but were still put up for adoption. According to the report, in just one year, five shelter employees had been “violently bitten by dogs [who] were either on the adoption floor, or getting prepared to go there.” A follow-up report described the fatal mauling of Kaiser, a small dog who was being walked by his guardian when he was killed by a known aggressive dog adopted from the shelter. A witness to the attack said that Kaiser’s guardian was also “left bloodied and bitten” after trying, in vain, to save his canine companion.

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

WinnipegFreePress.com reported that authorities had seized four live dogs from a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Love Is Fur Ever Rescue and Foster Team (LIFERAFT) after they were called to the property by other local “rescuers.” The director of another local “rescue” said that other dogs had been returned to “rescues” that had transferred the animals to LIFERAFT. Local “rescuers” also reported finding several centimeters of feces caked on the floor, chewed walls, two dead puppies, and more dead puppies “liquefying” in the house. An adult dog was found with infected ulcers around her eyes and mouth, “and beetles were eating away at her face,” according to another local “rescuer.” A veterinarian who was treating one of the dogs after she had been removed reported that she was underweight, dehydrated, and hungry and had pneumonia and “a lot of infection in the blood.” WinnipegSun.com reported that authorities had removed five dead puppies and about a dozen dogs from the property. It wasn’t clear if criminal charges would be pursued.

Polk City, Florida

TheLedger.com reported that authorities had seized 197 animals, including pigs, chickens, dogs, cats, ducks, a rabbit, and a horse from a self-professed “no-kill” animal “rescue” doing business as Darlynn’s Darlins Rescue Ranch, Inc. The owners were each charged with three counts of felony cruelty to animals and 138 counts of animal neglect after volunteers from PETA provided authorities with information and video footage of severe neglect of animals at the property. (See PETA’s full exposé here.) Starving animals were found with open wounds and hooves so overgrown that they had trouble walking, and some pigs’ tusks were so overgrown that they were embedded into the sides of their faces, making it difficult, if not impossible, to eat. Detectives determined that a large hog named Buddy had died at the facility after lying in the front yard at the “rescue” for 14 summer days in respiratory distress, unable to eat or drink.

Monroe, Connecticut

MonroeCourier.com reported that Rep. Themis Klarides, the minority leader in the Connecticut House of Representatives, had visited the SPCA of Connecticut, a self-professed “no-kill” animal shelter, and reported finding sick kittens and “deplorable” conditions. Every kitten at the facility reportedly suffered from an upper respiratory infection, and the owner of the facility was in court related to his recent conviction of 11 counts of cruelty to animals. Connecticut.News12.com reported that prosecutors asserted that he would pay open-admission shelters $20 or less for animals, confine them in inhumane conditions, and try to resell them for up to $400 each. He was also previously convicted of 15 charges of cruelty to animals after authorities seized more than 60 dogs from an unheated, unfinished barn-like structure where 15 of them were found in the early signs of hypothermia. Rep. Klarides was working on legislation aimed at regulating “rescues” and private animal shelters in the state as a result of her findings.

Rockville, Maryland

WJLA.com reported that authorities had seized nearly 40 animals from a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Alpha Group Animal Rescue after they were found living in “deplorable conditions.” Nine chickens, 28 cats, and two dogs were seized. The chickens were reportedly covered with feces and kept outdoors in cramped crates, and the cats and dogs in the home were infested with fleas. A kitten was found so debilitated that euthanasia was required. Large amounts of feces had also accumulated inside the home. The “rescue” operators were charged with multiple counts of cruelty to animals.

Glendale, Arizona

ABC15.com reported that authorities had seized 52 dogs from a self-professed animal “rescuer” after they were found outside in the heat without shelter. Two of the dogs were found dead, and a third dog died on the way to an animal hospital. The “rescuer” was arrested and faced “a slew of charges, including 49 counts of misdemeanor cruelty to animals and three counts of felony cruelty to animals.” A later report revealed that some of the surviving dogs appeared to suffer from apparently untreated old injuries and ear problems, and one dog was having trouble using his or her hind legs.

Neosho, Missouri

FourStatesHomepage.com reported that an animal shelter operated by Faithful Friends Animal Advocates—a self-professed “no-kill” shelter that charges fees and accepts only select animals—was full and that people were dumping unwanted or homeless animals at the facility at all hours of the day and night, leaving them on the doorstep, at the gate, and even “shoving them in the doors.” Neighbors were complaining because animals abandoned at the property were roaming the streets and yards in the area.

Reports Showing How ‘No-Kill’ Policies Harmed Animals in July 2016

Hoke County, North Carolina

FayObserver.com reported that authorities had seized 121 dogs, cats, goats, horses, and birds from the home of a self-professed animal “rescuer” after they were found hoarded and “in various states of neglect.” The “rescuer” had reportedly acquired them from animal shelters in North Carolina and possibly South Carolina. Authorities found animals without food or water and in need of veterinary care. WNCN.com reported that authorities investigated after receiving a complaint from a veterinarian who found a horse on the property who was so malnourished that the animal had to be euthanized. The “rescuer” was charged with felony animal neglect and resisting and obstructing officers. The county sheriff said that this case was one of the worst that he’s seen during his 14 years as sheriff. 

Austin, Texas

MyStatesman.com reported that the Austin Animal Center, which touts itself as a “no-kill” shelter, had been intermittently turning away “healthy cats and kittens” and “healthy medium-large dogs.” Local residents also alleged that the facility had turned away pregnant cats in several instances as well as other animals in need of medical care after being given only cursory examinations by volunteers in tents set up outside. A reporter who visited the crowded facility said that five larger dogs were being housed in metal cages covered with sheets in a conference room and a large pit bull mix was living “in a [cage] out back in an open air truck port.”

Madison, Tennessee

WRCBTV.com reported that authorities had seized 41 dogs from a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Happy Endings Animal Rescue after they were found “living in feces and filth” at the property. Many of them were reportedly suffering from medical problems, some weren’t spayed or neutered, and there was no water and little food at the home, which lacked electricity. A neighbor alleged that dogs had been heard crying at the property and that the “rescue” operator had been heard and seen beating them. The “rescue” claimed to be the “largest privately run, nonprofit animal rescue in the city.” Its operator was arrested on one count of cruelty to animals, and more charges were expected. NashvilleScene.com reported that some of the medical issues identified in dogs removed from the property included starvation, dental disease, and severe hair loss.

Owen County, Indiana

WISHTV.com reported that two people had been arrested after authorities removed more than 70 dogs found hoarded at their property. One of the suspects told authorities that he wanted to run an animal “sanctuary” and that some of the animals were strays. An earlier story reported that more than 90 percent of the dogs removed were malnourished and many were suffering from fleas, ticks, and skin issues. One dog reportedly had tumors on his paws that could require the amputation of some of his toes. Conditions at the property were described as “deplorable.” 

Lindsay, Oklahoma

PaulsValleyDailyDemocrat.com reported that more than 100 animals had been removed from the home of a self-professed animal “rescuer” after they were found hoarded and stacked in cages throughout the residence. The local sheriff said, “The conditions were terrible. … It took our breath away. Many of the animals were in crates, and I’m alleging they were being deprived.” Authorities removed 60 cats, 20 dogs, 15 rabbits, and other animals, including ferrets and a kinkajou. Criminal charges were being considered against the “rescuer,” who had reportedly been charged with felony cruelty to animals in 2012 after 22 horses in her possession were found to be deprived of care.

Flagler County, Florida

HistoricCity.com reported that authorities had served a search warrant at a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as SAFFARI Rescue after receiving three complaints alleging cruelty to animals at the facility. Conditions there were described as “overwhelming,” with 20 to 30 dogs and puppies confined to one building and at least 17 cats in one enclosure. More than 20 puppies, five adult dogs, and at least nine cats were voluntarily surrendered to authorities. StAugustine.com later reported that one of the surrendered puppies had died and nine others were being treated for the highly contagious and often fatal parvovirus.

Reports Showing How ‘No-Kill’ Policies Harmed Animals in June 2016

North Port, Florida

WTSP.com reported that 26 live and nine dead cats had been seized by authorities from the home of a man who told them that he had acquired the animals while operating a cat “rescue.” Cats were found suffering from infections of the upper respiratory system, eyes, and ears, and several had resorted to cannibalism. The odor from an accumulation of cat feces, urine, and garbage was so severe that authorities had to wear facial masks during the raid. The owner was charged with 35 counts of cruelty to animals for allegedly failing to provide the animals with adequate food, water, and medical care.

Lawrence, Michigan

WOODTV.com reported that authorities had seized 108 dogs, six cats, and a horse from the home of a couple claiming to be operating a “rescue.” Dogs were found without adequate food and water, and conditions in the home were described as “horrible.” Some dogs were underweight and suffered from mange, fleas, deformities, and injuries. The couple claimed to have acquired five pregnant dogs two years earlier as part of a “rescue program” and said that the population then “exploded.” The stench of animal urine and feces was so strong that it could be smelled from several hundred feet away and authorities had to wear respiratory masks during the raid. The couple was charged with cruelty to animals. Another report revealed that the pair had previously been cited for noxious odors coming from another residence and for having too many animals, including many who needed medical care. At that time, the couple was operating a self-professed “rescue” doing business as Cuddly Critters Animal Rescue.

Newhall, California

HometownStation.com reported that a man had alleged that his dog died while left outdoors on a hot summer day at a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as New Leash on Life Rescue, where he was being boarded. While at the “rescue,” he had reportedly been placed in an outdoor kennel. An attendant later found him collapsed near loose feces, with a blue tongue and white gums. The dog’s owner had a post-mortem veterinary examination performed, which reportedly revealed that the animal’s tongue was blue, his lungs had red spots on them, and there was blood in his trachea. The man sent a demand letter to the “rescue,” which said that it was awaiting the results of its own investigation.

Stokes County, North Carolina

MyFOX8.com reported that the Stokes County Animal Shelter had announced that it would no longer accept strays or owner-surrendered animals, in an attempt to “save many animals from having to be euthanized.” The county manager said, “It’s just unbelievable the number of animals people just want to give up.”

Morongo Valley, California

HiDesertStar.com reported that authorities had seized more than 150 animals, including dogs, cats, rabbits, and birds from a self-professed “no-kill” animal “rescue” doing business as Paws Pet Ranch/Paws Rescue Ranch after they found the body of a dog who had died as the result of being chained outside without water or shade. A search and seizure warrant was issued at the home where the “stench of urine and feces” reportedly “drifted from the open door” as officers removed animals. Some dogs were described as skinny, and others reportedly limped or had missing fur and visible injuries. The owner was charged with illegally possessing a desert tortoise, and the possibility of other criminal charges was being investigated. The owner also lacked a required license to operate a kennel at the property.

Cortland, Nebraska

1011Now.com reported that for the first time in history, the Nebraska Department of Agriculture had suspended the license of an animal shelter. The self-professed “no-kill” animal shelter was doing business as Stickney’s Toy Breed Rescue and Retirement Sanctuary and was cited for repeated violations of the Nebraska Commercial Dog and Cat Operator Inspection Act. The “rescue” allegedly adopted out dogs with health problems, including internal and external parasites, mange, and ringworm; grouped aggressive dogs with weaker ones; and failed to keep adequate records, including two allegations of falsifying adoption records. The case was pending.

Bixby, Oklahoma

KJRH.com reported that authorities had seized more than 60 animals from a home without a required kennel license. Authorities saw a woman there hit one of the dogs with a stick. KTUL.com reported that nearly 70 large-breed dogs were found confined to crates inside the home, where residents said that they were trying to run an animal “rescue” organization. One person was arrested on a complaint of cruelty to animals. TulsaWorld.com reported that some of the dogs who were removed suffered from apparently untreated conditions, including mange, ear mites, and severely matted fur.

Cottrellville Township, Michigan

TheTimesHerald.com reported that authorities had seized 98 dogs from the home of a couple who told them that they were breeding, showing, and “rescuing” the animals. The dogs were found living in conditions described as “squalid” and “covered in feces and urine.” Cruelty-to-animals charges were being considered.

Cherry Hill, New Jersey

CourierPostOnline.com reported that a self-professed “no-kill” animal shelter had adopted out a kitten who began acting aggressively and exhibiting neurological problems and then bit two people in the new home. The kitten, who had been vaccinated for rabies before the adoption, was euthanized and tested positive for the fatal virus. Both family members were to receive post-exposure rabies treatment.

Bay Minette, Alabama

FOX10TV.com reported that after a dog had been turned away from a self-professed “no-kill” shelter, her owner “picked her up by the back of her skin and tossed her” into the car. “He was punching her hard enough to where she was screaming and squealing and I could see him just flexing all the way back with a closed fist,” said the shelter’s administrative assistant. “He was just punching her and punching her.” Shelter officials then accepted the dog and decided not to pursue charges against the owner for fear of retaliation.

Aylett, Virginia

GoDanRiver.com reported that 42 horses had been seized from a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as New Beginnings Horse Rescue, including several who had been seized by authorities the previous year from another self-professed “rescue.” This latest seizure was the result of an investigation into complaints about malnourished and unhealthy horses at the “rescue” who had not been provided with adequate food or water. Criminal charges were pending against the “rescue,” and authorities reported that the case “underscores the reality that the lack of oversight, inspection and regulation of animal rescue facilities in Virginia limits the ability of local government to prevent, manage or budget for these situations.”

Annapolis, Maryland

SOMD.com reported that the operator of a self-professed “no-kill” animal “rescue” doing business as Orphaned Wildlife Rescue Center, Inc., had been charged with cruelty to animals and practicing veterinary medicine without a license. State officials found animals at the “rescue” who “should have been euthanized due to the extent of their injuries,” an osprey confined to a cage so small that the bird’s muscles had atrophied, and animals on whom the “rescue’s” operator, who was not a veterinarian, had performed surgery. According to charging documents, he had operated on ospreys and a snake and acknowledged doing so on other animals. He reportedly told authorities that “it was not cost effective to send every animal he admitted to his center to an independent veterinarian.”

Amarillo, Texas

NewsChannel10.com reported that a self-professed “rescue” doing business as Texas Panhandle Pet Savers had been suspended from removing animals from the Amarillo-Panhandle Humane Society following five incidents in which dogs were neglected, returned, or injured while in the care of families with which they were placed through the group. In one case, a dog was dragged behind a pickup truck by a foster family.

Weatherford, Texas

WeatherfordDemocrat.com reported that an outbreak of a canine infectious respiratory disease at the Weatherford & Parker County Animal Shelter had been the result of “overcrowding caused by attempts to avoid euthanasia.” Contagious animals had reportedly been placed in homes and “rescues.”

Davie, Florida

WSVN.com reported that a self-professed “no-kill sanctuary” doing business as Be Kind to Animals Rescue planned to shut down following an investigation that revealed that thousands of dollars donated to it had been misspent. Records apparently revealed that donations were used on personal expenses, including theater tickets, hotels, restaurants, doctor’s visits, and nail salons. The owner also admitted that “eight or nine” dogs had been killed by other dogs at the “sanctuary” after they were inappropriately housed. State officials were reviewing the business’s financial records.

Austin, Texas

KXAN.com reported that to maintain its “no-kill” status, the city animal shelter had transferred hundreds of dangerous dogs to a “rescue,” where they were put up for adoption, including many who had been involved in attacks that had caused “severe” injuries to people. One dog had been involved in at least two biting incidents and had been caged at the “rescue” on and off for three years.

Reports Showing How ‘No-Kill’ Policies Harmed Animals in May 2016

Chicago, Illinois

NBCChicago.com reported that a self-professed “no-kill rescue” doing business as Settlers Pond Shelter was accused by former employees of neglecting and starving animals and allowing them to die in inhumane conditions. One former employee said, “It became normal for me to see an animal die and just throw [him or her] in the back in a pile … and that was it.” He said he was fired after complaining to staff about a lack of food for the animals and poor conditions that he says caused animals to die. In August 2015, the “rescue” was reportedly cited by state authorities after an inspector found underweight donkeys who needed their hooves trimmed and an underweight potbellied pig. The “rescue’s” nonprofit status had also reportedly been revoked.

DeKalb County, Georgia

FOX5Atlanta.com reported that the self-professed “no-kill” DeKalb County Animal Shelter, managed by LifeLine Animal Project, failed to give food to 30 dogs during a 47-hour period that was captured on surveillance video. This incident came after police had filed a complaint with a shelter official because the dogs appeared to be undernourished. In March, police had seized two starving dogs who were housed there. After taking them back to the shelter, police returned two weeks later to find that they showed no signs of improvement. Another dog who had been seized by police was found dead at the shelter one morning after he apparently tried to squeeze out of a stainless steel cage in which he’d been housed. LifeLine’s founder also admitted on camera to releasing animals without spaying or neutering them first.

White River Junction, Vermont

RutlandHerald.com reported that both the former shelter manager and the vice president of the board of directors of a self-professed “no-kill” cat shelter doing business as Webster’s House had been charged with drowning a cat and lying about it to police. The charges were filed after a four-month investigation. The bodies of three kittens and another adult cat found at the shelter were examined by a forensic veterinarian who said that it was “highly likely” that they had also been drowned. The investigation reportedly began after a volunteer was told not to go into the bathroom at the shelter and found a dead cat in a bucket of water. She was told that the cat couldn’t be taken to a veterinarian because of an outstanding $4,000 bill. Medical records from a local veterinary hospital revealed a long list of increasingly sick cats at the shelter and thousands of dollars in unpaid bills. A local farmer who said he buried cats on his farm for the shelter turned over to police three large bags containing 22 dead cats and kittens. The shelter was reportedly closed after being evicted.

Studio City, California

NBCLosAngeles.com reported that authorities seized 65 dogs from a self-professed “no-kill rescue” doing business as Lucky Puppy Rescue & Retail. Many of the animals were reportedly suffering from medical conditions and were seized for “humane reasons.” The “rescue” owner was facing charges of animal neglect and operating an illegal kennel. ABC7.com reported that the owner said that most of the animals had been given to her by local animal shelters.

Lancaster County, Pennsylvania

ABC27.com reported that authorities had seized seven horses from a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as A Life Saved Is a Life Saved Equine Rescue. The animals were described as emaciated, and two horses were described as lethargic. There was not adequate shelter, hay, or water available for the animals. Another horse seized earlier from the “rescue” died days later. Test results reportedly indicated that the animal had suffered from an untreated virus and had been starved. Cruelty-to-animals charges were being considered.

Reports Showing How ‘No-Kill’ Policies Harmed Animals in April 2016

Cold Creek, Nevada

KTNV.com reported that authorities had seized more than 400 animals from unhealthy, substandard conditions at Desert Rescue Animal Sanctuary. Nearly 100 animals had to be euthanized. LasVegasNow.com reported that criminal charges were expected to be filed.

Hillsborough County, Florida

WFLA.com reported that concerned area residents had alleged that the Hillsborough County animal shelter had adopted animals to individuals with violent criminal histories in an effort to increase its live-release rate. Some of the cases of concern included that of a man who had served time in state prison for child kidnapping, carjacking, and robbery and was allowed to adopt a pit bull from the shelter. The shelter released the dog to him in September, and the animal was picked up as a stray two months later. However, the adopter had been incarcerated again at that time. County officials were being urged to require better screening of potential adopters, including conducting criminal background checks.

Dania Beach, Florida

Sun-Sentinel.com reported that 34 dogs had been rescued by firefighters from the burning home of a self-professed animal “rescuer” who fostered animals for organizations, including Florida Cocker Spaniel Rescue. One dog died while being taken to an animal hospital. A neighbor said of the woman, “She’s a dog hoarder, plain and simple.” He said that he had filed numerous complaints with the city because of the noise and odors. NationalPost.com reported that firefighters battling the blaze were obstructed by the many items inside the home and kept finding dogs, many of whom were unconscious. Five of the dogs were in critical condition.

Livingston Parish, Louisiana

LivingstonParishNews.com reported that the Livingston Parish Animal Shelter had refused to accept badly injured dogs, who were part of a cruelty-to-animals investigation, from a sheriff’s deputy because shelter staff did not want to euthanize them. Weeks earlier, the dogs’ owner had allegedly tried to surrender them to the shelter but was denied assistance. One of the dogs couldn’t walk because his back was reportedly broken, another was covered with what appeared to an eyewitness to be tumors, and one suffered from “an open wound from the top of [the dog’s] inside thigh to the hip, as if [the animal] had been ‘cut by a filet knife.’” In 2013, an animal control committee member said that parish residents were “tired of watching dogs in bad shape, emaciated and suffering.” He continued, “People in neighborhoods are watching them die” because of the shelter’s turn-away, “no-kill” policies.

Crown Point, Indiana

NWITimes.com reported that a self-professed animal “rescuer” who was fostering six dogs given to her by Chihuahua Rescue of Indiana had been charged with cruelty to animals. The charges were filed after a dog being boarded by the “rescuer” was returned to his owners in poor condition, with his fur matted with feces and irritation around the base of his tail, apparently from sitting in a cage in his own waste. The dog had also lost weight while in the “rescuer’s” possession, and a report filed by a responding law-enforcement officer said that the residence “smelled strongly of feces and urine.” The foster dogs were removed.

Pasco County, Florida

WTSP.com reported that 87 dogs and cats had been seized by authorities from a woman operating an animal “rescue” out of her home. Ammonia levels in the residence were so high that an emergency management team was called to test the indoor air quality, which was so bad that it “blew the [testing] scale away.” Animals were found with skin conditions, and urine-soaked towels were found piled up in the residence. The woman and a caretaker were both cited for cruelty to animals. In 2005, the same woman and an assistant were convicted in Ulster County, New York, on charges of failure to give proper sustenance and failure to supply proper food and drink to an impounded animal after more than 100 animals were seized from her home, where she was doing business as Patty’s Angels animal shelter. The New York property was also “contaminated with feces and standing water.”

Middle Island, New York

NewYork.CBSLocal.com reported that a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Friends of Freddie Pet Rescue had been told to vacate a shopping center after being cited for numerous fire- and safety-code violations. Authorities said that despite being warned for months that the store was not safe for animals, the “rescue” continued to bring them in and house them there. Town officials said that they were cracking down partly as a result of a fire that killed several animals inside another shelter operating illegally in the area.

Harvard, Illinois

NWHerald.com reported that the state had revoked Ceasers Heaven Animal Rescue’s shelter license after discovering that the operator had failed to disclose 13 prior felony convictions, including fraud, theft, and unlawful placement of an adopted child. It was also reported that she had been fined in 2013 for operating an animal shelter out of her home without a license and in 2015 for failing to sterilize and/or microchip a dog and keep adoption records. The state barred her from holding an animal shelter license for a minimum of three years.

Chester, Vermont

EagleTimes.com reported that following an investigation by the local police department, Webster’s House Animal Shelter, formerly The Animal Rescue and Protection Society, Inc., had been evicted and was also ordered to have a veterinarian conduct health checks on all the cats in its possession. The investigation had apparently been opened after a visitor to the facility “witnessed something that happened that was ‘not in keeping with a humane shelter.’” No additional details were provided.

Lincoln County, Colorado

DenverPost.com reported that authorities had seized 60 neglected animals, including puppies, parrots, and horses from a couple operating a substandard and unlicensed “rescue” in which animals were living in unsanitary conditions. The couple was also allegedly breeding dogs on the property. Animals were found suffering from malnutrition and untreated medical conditions. In a statement, the sheriff’s office said, “The conditions these animals had to endure were terrible.” An investigation was ongoing.

Reports Showing How ‘No-Kill’ Policies Harmed Animals in March 2016

Macon, Georgia

41NBC.com reported that the former director of a self-professed animal “rescue” doing business as Macon Purrs N Paws was charged with theft for allegedly using nearly $90,000 in donations made to the group for personal expenses. The case was under investigation.

Cheyenne, Wyoming

KGWN.TV reported that authorities had seized nearly 40 animals from a woman who was on probation after being convicted of cruelty-to-animals charges in 2010. The animals were found living in squalor. Some were locked inside kennels so filled with feces that their water dishes were described as being “mortared” into place, and at least 13 animals had no access to water at all. Many of the animals suffered from severe dental disease. In 2010, WyomingNews.com reported that authorities had seized more than 100 animals, including 45 dogs, from the same woman while she was doing business as Litl’ Bit of Love Animal Rescue and Sanctuary. The 45 dogs were living in a small, filthy residence. The floor was “littered with feces,” and the foul odor could be detected from 20 feet away.

Hewitt, Texas

Bloomberg.com reported that a lawsuit had been filed alleging that the former chief executive of Life Partners Holdings Inc., who was accused of cheating investors out of $1.3 billion, used an animal shelter doing business as Happy Endings Dog Rescue to funnel money to his mistress. The “rescue” was accused of failing to provide for dogs in its care and abandoning 250 animals at another facility. The complaint also alleged that at one point, Happy Endings was receiving funding for more than 20 people who were no longer on its payroll.

Vernon, Texas

TexomasHomepage.com reported that authorities had seized 108 cats who were being hoarded in “deplorable” conditions at the residence of a woman who “was planning on opening a no-kill shelter.” The home reportedly smelled “like death, ammonia.” Star-Telegram.com reported that the majority of the animals were infested with parasites and suffered from respiratory infections. Five of them had been preliminarily diagnosed with feline leukemia or feline immunodeficiency virus, 18 were pregnant, and a neighbor said that 30 to 40 cats were buried in the front yard of the home.

La Feria, Texas

KRGV.com reported that authorities had seized 57 dogs and cats from a self-professed animal “rescue.” Many had no access to water, and most were in such “bad shape” that euthanasia was being considered. Some dogs suffered from severe skin disease. Feces and urine covered the floors of the house, and a dead dog was found stuffed into a cooler. Ten additional animals were seized from another property owned by the same “rescuer.” A later report revealed that one of the dogs tested positive for distemper and that some of the dogs were pregnant. Felony cruelty-to-animals charges were being considered.

Stamford, Connecticut

StamfordAdvocate.com reported that the city of Stamford had agreed to pay $290,000 to a man bitten by a dog he was considering adopting at the city’s animal shelter. The “no-kill” shelter manager at the time of the incident was removed and charged with three counts of reckless endangerment. She was accused of misrepresenting the biting history of three other animals who were later adopted and bit again, as well as failing to supervise shelter volunteers properly and allowing them to run the facility.

Anna, Illinois

KFVS12.com reported that volunteers and an ex-employee of a “no-kill” shelter doing business as PAWS Animal Shelter accused the facility of allowing sick animals to die inside cages, warehousing one dog at the facility for eight years, and keeping dogs in cages for extended periods, resulting in “behavioral issues,” including “twirling in cages.”

Chambersburg, Pennsylvania

PublicOpinionOnline.com reported that the owner of Greener Pastures No-Kill Animal Rescue was due in court to face charges related to allegedly spending more than $128,000 in donations made to the “rescue” on personal expenses. Checks from the “rescue’s” bank account reportedly included those to the owner’s personal defense attorneys, probation payments, vehicle payments, and mortgage. The operator was reportedly on probation after pleading guilty to forgery in 2011.

Reports Showing How ‘No-Kill’ Policies Harmed Animals in February 2016

February 2016/Austin, Texas: KXAN.com reported that the city’s “no-kill” policy had resulted in a 146 percent increase in the city shelter’s budget, which was costing Austin nearly $12 million annually. The number of employees had also increased from 81.5 to 106.5. Dog trainers accused the shelter and its partners of adopting out aggressive dogs in order to maintain the shelter’s “no-kill” status. Dog-bite reports in Austin had reportedly increased by 58 percent since 2009.

Mojave, California

TurnTo23.com reported that authorities had seized more than 100 animals from Oasis Feral Cat Sanctuary after they were found living in unsanitary conditions. Many were suffering from illnesses and other medical conditions that apparently developed during their time at the property. The operator of the “sanctuary” was facing a felony cruelty-to-animals charge.

Homestead, Florida

Sun-Sentinel.com reported that the filthy home of a self-professed animal “rescuer” doing business as Helping Hands cat and dog “rescue” had been condemned and that authorities seized 16 live dogs and the bodies of 12 dead cats from the dwelling. Authorities planned to return to remove 48 live cats. The residence also operated as a licensed assisted living facility. An elderly woman had escaped and flagged down a driver for help. The woman smelled like urine and said that she hadn’t eaten all day. Four people were taken out of the facility, and the operator faced four criminal counts of elder neglect.

Logan County, Kentucky

BGDailyNews.com reported that authorities had seized custody of five horses from a board member of the “no-kill” Logan County Humane Society and cited her with cruelty to animals after the animals were found in “extremely dirty stalls” without adequate hoof or dental care. According to the citation, the horses’ owner said that she had been working and “didn’t have much time to take care of the horses.” Three deer, two opossums, a raccoon, and a squirrel were also removed from the property, where they had been illegally confined. The wild animals were taken to a licensed rehabilitation facility, and the horses were under the care of a veterinarian and farrier at the owner’s property. The owner resigned from the shelter’s board.

Contra Costa County, California

SFGate.com reported that Contra Costa County animal shelters had stopped accepting owner-surrendered animals for at least 30 days in an attempt to decrease crowding while maintaining high adoption statistics.

Torrington, Connecticut

WTNH.com reported that the operator of Just For Labs Rescue was facing criminal third-degree larceny charges for allegedly posting photos of a dog and claiming that the animal was available for adoption. At least three people had sent adoption fees. The photos used were allegedly from other websites in other states, and no one received a dog or a refund.

Farmington, Maine

SunJournal.com reported that a cat and kitten had been abandoned in a zippered travel bag at the limited-admission Franklin County Animal Shelter. The facility doesn’t accept most animals and charges a fee for those it does take in.

Houma, Louisiana

HoumaToday.com reported that a pair of self-professed animal “rescuers” doing business as My Heart’s Desire had been charged with 36 counts of animal neglect after more than 30 animals were found in deplorable conditions at their home. Animal feces, urine, and fur “covered” surfaces throughout the house. WDSU.com reported that several dogs had been found with deteriorating medical conditions including arthritis, tumors, severe ear infections, and degenerative joint disease. Some were malnourished, were infested with internal parasites, or had broken bones. The pair told officials that they had acquired the animals from animal shelters and the general public, and some had been at the “rescue” for years. 

Hoke County, North Carolina

TheTimesNews.com reported that nearly 700 animals had been seized by authorities from a couple doing business as The Haven-Friends for Life “no-kill” animal shelter, which billed itself as “North Carolina’s most successful no-kill shelter.” The operators were charged with four counts of cruelty to animals and three counts of possession of a controlled substance. After the seizure, about half of the adult dogs and 182 cats had to be kept in isolation because of respiratory illnesses and other contagious conditions such as ringworm, and 10 veterinarians were needed to treat medical conditions, including open wounds, starvation, and lethargy. WRAL.com reported that dozens of dead animals had been found buried on the property, where authorities had also found animals confined to dirty cages, kennels, and outdoor pens and paddocks, many with no protection from the elements.

Reports Showing How ‘No-Kill’ Policies Harmed Animals in January 2016

Rockville, Maryland

MyMCMedia.org reported that 66 dogs had been seized by authorities from a self-professed animal “rescuer” doing business as Forever Homes Animal Rescue, Inc. The operator had been charged with 66 counts of cruelty to animals after the dogs were found languishing in filthy crates and suffering from a variety of ailments, many of which resulted from neglect. Three of the dogs were in “such a severe state of medical decline” that they had to be euthanized, and one dog died from unknown causes. The defendant told authorities that the majority of the dogs at her home had come from animal shelters located in the northeast region of the United States.

Hillsborough County, Florida

WFLA.com reported that Hillsborough County Pet Resources, the county’s animal sheltering agency, was apparently making it more difficult for people to surrender animals to the shelter in an attempt to improve the facility’s “live-release rate.” Workers at two local veterinary hospitals said they were told by the county shelter to abandon illegally animals who had been abandoned at their places of business and alleged that the county facility was “more concerned about raising its live-release rate than caring for animals.” 

Stevens County, Washington

Spokesman.com reported that a self-professed animal “rescuer” doing business as The Shepherd’s Way Animal Rescue had been convicted of theft for allegedly using her “animal rescue service to prey on people’s willingness to help by stealing their money.” The deputy prosecuting attorney said that the “rescuer” had a criminal history of fraud and theft that dates back decades. In the recent case, the defendant took $3,000 from people who wanted to adopt three horses from the “rescue” but failed to give them the animals.

Parkland, Florida

Local10.com reported that a self-professed animal “rescuer” doing business as K94U Dog Rescue had been ordered by authorities to remove all dogs from the group’s property within seven days after 40 to 60 dogs were found stacked in small cages in a barn-like structure.

Gloucester, Virginia

GazetteJournal.net reported that the Gloucester-Mathews Humane Society will no longer accept every animal needing refuge taken to the facility by owners who can’t—or won’t—care for them any longer. The decision was reportedly made to reduce expenses as well as maintain “high live release numbers” at the facility.

Iredell County, North Carolina

SalisburyPost.com reported that a self-professed animal “rescuer” doing business as Purfect Purbaby Rescue (PPR) had been charged with criminal animal abandonment after more than a dozen cats were found dumped on the side of a road. Iredell County investigation reports allegedly reveal that microchips implanted in the abandoned cats traced to kittens released to the “rescuer” by the Rowan County Animal Shelter (RCAS). RCAS estimated that it had released several hundred cats to PPR and that the group had more than once “adopted every cat” who might be euthanized at the facility. An investigation was ongoing.

Eureka Springs, Arkansas

LovelyCitizen.com reported that authorities had launched an investigation into conditions at the Good Shepherd Humane Society “no-kill” shelter after receiving a complaint alleging that animals were severely neglected and languishing at the facility in harsh conditions, without adequate food and with no real chance of finding new homes. According to a newly hired shelter manager, animals at the facility were not receiving adequate amounts of food, some suffered from “a lot of health issues that are compromising the welfare of other animals in the shelter,” and in some cases, dogs and cats were housed together. The group’s board had reportedly voted to close the shelter temporarily, and a criminal investigation was ongoing.

Lake Station, Illinois

ChicagoTribune.com reported that authorities had seized 72 cats, four dogs, and one raccoon from the home of a self-professed animal “rescuer” doing business as Rachel’s Fosters animal shelter. The “rescuer” was facing criminal charges of forgery and animal abandonment or neglect. Animals seized suffered from a variety of illnesses, including open sores, ringworm, and upper respiratory disease. Some had difficulty breathing, and others had to be euthanized because of the severity of their conditions. Police said that animal feces had accumulated along the baseboards of the home, and litterboxes were overflowing with excrement.

Glendale, Arizona

ABC15.com reported that a self-professed animal “rescuer” who told authorities that she worked for Haven Animal Rescue and housed dogs at her home until they were ready for adoption had been charged with cruelty to animals after three dead dogs were found in cages at the residence. In addition to the dead animals, police said that they had found trash covering the floor, urine and feces throughout the residence, and 18 dogs either caged or wandering without access to water or adequate food. Conditions were described as “deplorable.”

202320222021 | 2020 | 201920182017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008

GET PETA UPDATES
Stay up to date on the latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your inbox!

By submitting this form, you’re acknowledging that you have read and agree to our privacy policy and agree to receive e-mails from us.

Get the Latest Tips—Right in Your Inbox
We’ll e-mail you weekly with the latest in vegan recipes, fashion, and more!

By submitting this form, you’re acknowledging that you have read and agree to our privacy policy and agree to receive e-mails from us.