PETA to Appeal Rubber-Stamping Ruling for Summer Wind Farms Sanctuary

PETA to Appeal Rubber-Stamping Ruling for Summer Wind Farms Sanctuary

For Immediate Release:
September 8, 2016

David Perle 202-483-7382

Brown City, Mich.PETA is asking the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to review a lower court ruling that found that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has the discretion automatically to renew (or “rubber stamp”) licenses issued to exhibitors, such as Summer Wind Farms Sanctuary (SWFS) in Brown City, that are in chronic violation of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). PETA notes that the AWA allows an animal exhibitor or dealer to be issued a license only if the applicant operates in accordance with AWA regulations. PETA’s lawsuit argues that exhibitors cannot simultaneously violate the AWA and be in compliance with it—so the USDA’s rubber-stamping policy is illegal. SWFS was implicated in PETA’s lawsuit because the facility was cited 98 times in 2014 and its license was renewed in December 2014.

“The court’s decision allowing the USDA to continue rubber-stamping licenses for hell-hole exhibitors like Summer Wind Farms Sanctuary condemns animals to suffer for years on end in filthy cages, without wholesome food, clean water, or proper veterinary care,” says PETA Foundation Director of Captive Animal Law Enforcement Brittany Peet. “PETA won’t give up until the USDA holds these serial violators accountable, and roadside zoos that imprison and exploit animals are relegated to history.”

PETA’s motto reads, in part, that “animals are not ours to use for entertainment.”

For more information, please visit

For Media: Contact PETA's
Media Response Team.


Get PETA Updates

Stay up to date on the latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your inbox!

By submitting this form, you’re acknowledging that you have read and agree to our privacy policy and agree to receive e-mails from us.

 Ingrid E. Newkirk

“Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, and going to circuses and zoos. We never considered the impact of these actions on the animals involved. For whatever reason, you are now asking the question: Why should animals have rights?” READ MORE

— Ingrid E. Newkirk, PETA President and co-author of Animalkind