Rats, Mice, and Birds Deserve Protection Under the Animal Welfare Act

The only federal law that offers any protection to animals in U.S. laboratories specifically excludes most of the animals killed in experiments. Rats, birds, and mice—who make up approximately 95 percent of all animals used in laboratories—have no legal protection under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA).

This is because on May 8, 2002, Congress passed the 2002 Farm Bill (H.R. 2646), which included an amendment from Sen. Jesse Helms—whose top contributors included major tobacco companies that experiment on animals—requiring that rats, mice, and birds be permanently excluded from any protection under the AWA. This bill essentially gives the experimentation industry free rein to subject these animals to excruciating procedures and conditions without providing even the minimal protections—such as pain relief—required for other animals.

Not only is it irrational to exclude rats, mice, and birds from protection, it also goes against the intent of Congress. Congress specifically amended the Animal Welfare Act in 1970 to ensure that “all warm-blooded species” used in experiments would receive adequate housing and veterinary care. Rats, mice, and birds are warm-blooded animals.

Former Sen. Bob Dole has stated, “As someone deeply involved with the process of revising and expanding the provisions of the AWA, I assure you that the AWA was meant to include birds, mice, and rats. When Congress stated that the AWA applied to ‘all warm-blooded animals,’ we certainly did not intend to exclude 95 percent of the animals used in biomedical research laboratories.”

Get PETA Updates

Stay up to date on the latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your inbox!

By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our collection, storage, use, and disclosure of your personal info in accordance with our privacy policy as well as to receiving e-mails from us.

 Ingrid E. Newkirk

“Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, and going to circuses and zoos. We never considered the impact of these actions on the animals involved. For whatever reason, you are now asking the question: Why should animals have rights?” READ MORE

— Ingrid E. Newkirk, PETA President and co-author of Animalkind