Charlotte Ross’ Skin Isn’t Indecent

Published by PETA.

A New York court saved NYPD Blue some green today by nullifying a $1.2 million fine that the Federal Communications Commission handed to ABC after the network aired an episode in which Charlotte Ross bared her backside. The court said that it wasn’t “per se indecent.” We agree. Baring one’s buns isn’t nearly as indecent as, say, bludgeoning bunnies for their fur.

Charlotte, who now has a recurring role alongside Lea Michele, Jane Lynch, and other PETA pals on the Fox hit Glee, showed that she’d rather bare her skin than wear animals’ skins in this ad she did for PETA while she was filming NYPD Blue. Pretty decent of her, eh?

Written by Michelle Sherrow

Get PETA Updates

Stay up to date on the latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your inbox!

By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our collection, storage, use, and disclosure of your personal info in accordance with our privacy policy as well as to receiving e-mails from us.

“Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, and going to circuses and zoos. We never considered the impact of these actions on the animals involved. For whatever reason, you are now asking the question: Why should animals have rights?” READ MORE

— Ingrid E. Newkirk, PETA President and co-author of Animalkind