PETA experts will expose the lack of scientific validity of testing on animals and explain why non-animal test methods are the way of the future.
Christine Lattin doesn’t like that PETA has exposed her cruel and pointless experiments on birds. We respond to her misleading comments.
Francis Collins can’t seem to provide a legitimate answer to the question, “Where does animal testing stand?” So we’ll help him.
The personal lubricant company is working with PETA scientists to advance non-animal test methods.
Most animal guardians don’t know that numerous companies are actually performing painful experiments on the same animals they purport to help.
PETA’s speaking out for the cats and dogs who are tortured and killed at Liberty Research. You can make a difference for these animals, too.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled in PETA’s favor in a public records lawsuit related to the importation of monkeys into the state for experimentation.
No one will suffer for these inhalation tests, and that’s a breath of fresh air.
Tofu and … cruel animal experiments? Not anymore! House Foods has agreed to eliminate animal tests after hearing from PETA.
In an in-depth piece on National Public Radio, researchers say that we learn absolutely nothing by drug testing on animals.
Thanks to an appeal from PETA U.K. and a petition signed by more than 15,000 supporters, the British government has agreed to request an investigation.
PETA’s successful use of the USDA’s database to expose misconduct by animal facilities—and the agency itself—shows why the records should remain online.
The PETA International Science Consortium Ltd. and experts from around the globe join forces to promote human-relevant tests that don’t use animals.
Several scientists won a PETA International Science Consortium award for efforts that will help animals and humans.
There was nothing sweet about what raspberry industry trade groups were doing to rats in laboratories.
