A coalition of animal-protection groups led by PETA filed a lawsuit today challenging the Trump administration’s extremely controversial decision to conceal records revealing whether laboratories, puppy mills, roadside zoos, and other animal-exploiting businesses are engaged in practices that violate the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA).
The lawsuit seeks to rectify the following three policy shifts made by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA):
- Its protection of animal abusers by removing thousands of AWA enforcement records—which were historically made available to the public—from its website and by refusing to post any new such records online. The only way in which the public can now obtain access to these records is by submitting separate Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for each one, which the agency takes months or even years to process. The agency now says that it will take more than three years to process even a simple FOIA request.
- The agency’s new practice of deleting from the AWA inspection reports that are posted names, license numbers, and other information that would identify the facility at issue, rendering these important documents virtually useless for ensuring that the USDA is enforcing the act. For example, a recent USDA inspection of a guinea pig breeder resulted in 10 violations of the AWA, and six animals were found dead—but the name and address of the breeder were redacted, so the public has no way of knowing who’s responsible.
- Its recently adopted practice of deleting critical information about the reasons given for denying animals relief from pain and distress from annual reports submitted by research facilities.
The USDA is protecting animal abusers—and hiding its own failure to protect animals—by refusing to post entire categories of records and heavily redacting those it does post. PETA and the other plaintiffs in this case want the USDA to post full public records on its website promptly so that consumers can know whether a puppy mill or a roadside zoo in their town is hurting animals and what the USDA is doing about it.
In addition to PETA, the plaintiffs in the case are the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, the Rescue and Freedom Project (formerly the Beagle Freedom Project), and PETA Foundation Deputy General Counsel Delcianna Winders, in her capacity as a visiting scholar at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University.
Learn more about PETA’s lawsuit against the USDA on The PETA Podcast:
Demand That the USDA Do Its Job to Protect Animals
The USDA is concealing information that’s crucial to PETA’s efforts to ensure that the agency actually does its job. Our dozens of investigations—such as our eyewitness exposé at notorious monkey dealer Primate Products, Inc., where we revealed monkeys cowering in fear and so neglected that they had frostbite and open, untreated wounds—show that the USDA can’t be trusted to enforce animal-protection laws and regulations without public oversight.
— PETA (@peta) February 28, 2017
Click the button below to ask your members of Congress to stop the agency from shielding itself—and animal exploiters—from scrutiny.
Note: PETA supports animal rights, opposes all forms of animal exploitation, and informs the public on those issues. It does not directly or indirectly participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office or any political party.