The New York Times Shines a Spotlight on the Dark Secrets of ‘Humane Meat’

Published by Michelle Kretzer.

Since meat companies started slapping happy, feel-good “humane” labels on animal flesh, animal advocates have been crying foul. And this week, The New York Times confirmed what we’ve been saying all along: The labels “mislead shoppers, who probably know little or nothing about the small number of organizations that create most of them.”

The Times found that companies can still label meat “humane” even if the animals endured crowding, continuous darkness, tail-docking, branding, beak slicing, and other cruel practices. It also notes that “humane” standards are often “similar to those [already] used in the meat industry” in general.

Read the full article here, and help spread the word that the only humane meal is a vegan one.

Get PETA Updates

Stay up to date on the latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your inbox!

By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our collection, storage, use, and disclosure of your personal info in accordance with our privacy policy as well as to receiving e-mails from us.

“Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, and going to circuses and zoos. We never considered the impact of these actions on the animals involved. For whatever reason, you are now asking the question: Why should animals have rights?” READ MORE

— Ingrid E. Newkirk, PETA President and co-author of Animalkind