Skip to Main Content
Animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way.

Seriously Good News for Rabbits

Written by PETA | August 3, 2010

After more than a decade of scientific research, negotiations, and lobbying by PETA, PETA U.K., and other groups, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has approved new, non-animal testing methods for measuring skin irritation. Now, across the world, rabbits will be spared as the standard way of testing for skin irritation is switched over to high-tech modern methods. This really is a global deal: The OECD produces binding safety testing guidelines for its more than 30 member nations—including the U.S.—and represents almost all of the world’s largest economies. Many countries that aren’t members also follow the OECD’s guidelines.

Animal-friendly methods employ in vitro toxicity screening, “skin” grown in laboratories, and computer models. While non-animal methods have been recognized for some time as valid for testing corrosivity (whether something will permanently damage the skin), these are the first methods to be recognized as effective in measuring skin irritation, thus allowing for a complete assessment of skin effects without the use of animals.

 


Pam is one of thousands of people who have taken action to get outdated animal testing procedures replaced with methods that rely on new technology. The bunny in her poster is a victim of the type of test that the OECD is replacing.

 

The methods that have just been adopted by the OECD use reconstructed human skin models that successfully reproduce the effect of chemicals on human skin and allow reliable, accurate measurements of damage in a way that applying chemicals to the shaved, raw skin of rabbits can not. Besides the pain and distress caused to the rabbits who are used in such tests, evidence considered by the OECD also included the fact that animal tests do not accurately measure whether a substance is likely to be an irritant to human skin—in other words, these methods will be better at protecting us too.

We’re particularly proud that PETA U.K. played an integral role in this process. Our affiliate financially supported the rigorous scientific testing of one of the non-animal methods that were just approved, and this helped to produce the scientific evidence that led the OECD to green-light the method. And on the U.S. side of things, PETA has given more than $850,000 over the past 10 years to the development and implementation of non-animal testing methods.

Thanks to this news, tens of thousands of rabbits a year will no longer suffer in these tests. And that should make us all feel pretty good.

Written by Shawna Flavell

Related Posts

Respond

Comments

Post a Comment

If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient as it may take some time to publish or may require moderation.

By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our collection, storage, use, and disclosure of your personal info in accordance with our privacy policy as well as to receiving e-mails from us.

  • Lilli says:

    HAL-LE-LU-JAH!!!!!! Thank you a thousand times over, OECD! Our Supreme being thanks you, too, I’m sure. The innocent should NEVER be made to suffer! And, I echo Justin, above. We (the USA) like to think of ourselves as so Hi-tech, but with us still testing on animals, we’re still barbarians.

  • Monica says:

    Excellent work PETA! And a big fat wet raspberry to all who say you don’t do what you say you do! I support you and can’t wait to read about your next victory for the animals! HUGS

  • claudia says:

    GREAT! but.. what do “guidelines” actually mean? what about when and where these “guidelines” will be really followed??

  • vicky says:

    Love PETA and all their work well done guys u make the world a wee bit better to live with. xx 33

  • Mandy says:

    Yay! That made my day! 3

  • ISABEL says:

    I m so happy with that

  • Justin Van Kleeck says:

    If only the USA could get its act together and strengthen the wishywashy Animal Welfare Act. As usual other nations particularly Europeans are ahead of us… And they call the USA the superpower? I would answer with Gandhi’s statement “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.”

  • Dawn Roderick says:

    Brilliant news. What a shame this didn’t come into force a lot sooner to spare the lives and suffering of all the animals.

Connect With PETA

Subscribe