PETA
Donate Now
  • Help Animals
    • Urgent Alerts
    • Our Campaigns
    • Action Team
    • Activist Guide
    • Get Active Online
    • Leaflets & Stickers
  • News
    • Features
    • Videos
    • Adoptable Animals
    • Rescue Stories
  • Investigations
    • Investigations & Rescue Fund
    • Report Cruelty to Animals
  • Animal Rights Issues
    • Animals Used for Experimentation
    • Food
    • Clothing
    • Entertainment
    • Companion Animals
    • Wildlife
  • Living
    • Living 101
    • Personal Care & Fashion
    • Food & Health
    • Recipes
    • Parents
    • Humane Home
    • Entertainment
    • Animal Companions
  • Students
    • peta2
    • PETA Kids
    • TeachKind
  • Shop
    • PETA SHOP
    • Cruelty-Free Database
    • Literature
    • PETA Shopping Guide
    • PETA-Approved Vegan
    • PETA Presents
  • About
    • Our Story
    • Our Views
    • Victories
    • Milestones
    • Volunteer
    • Work at PETA
    • Intern
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
    • PETA Global
  • Donate Now
    • Donate Now
    • Vanguard Society
    • ‘In Honor of’ and Memorial Gifts
    • More Ways to Support
    • Membership Services
    • Gifts in Wills
Report Cruelty to Animals
Skip to Content
PETA
Donate Now
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
Report Cruelty to Animals
PETA
Animals are not ours
to experiment on, eat, wear, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way.
  • Help Animals
    • Urgent Alerts
    • Our Campaigns
    • Action Team
    • Activist Guide
    • Get Active Online
    • Leaflets & Stickers
  • News
    • Features
    • Videos
    • Adoptable Animals
    • Rescue Stories
  • Investigations
    • Investigations & Rescue Fund
    • Report Cruelty to Animals
  • Animal Rights Issues
    • Animals Used for Experimentation
    • Food
    • Clothing
    • Entertainment
    • Companion Animals
    • Wildlife
  • Living
    • Living 101
    • Personal Care & Fashion
    • Food & Health
    • Recipes
    • Parents
    • Humane Home
    • Entertainment
    • Animal Companions
  • Students
    • peta2
    • PETA Kids
    • TeachKind
  • Shop
    • PETA SHOP
    • Cruelty-Free Database
    • Literature
    • PETA Shopping Guide
    • PETA-Approved Vegan
    • PETA Presents
  • About
    • Our Story
    • Our Views
    • Victories
    • Milestones
    • Volunteer
    • Work at PETA
    • Intern
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
    • PETA Global
  • Donate Now
    • Donate Now
    • Vanguard Society
    • ‘In Honor of’ and Memorial Gifts
    • More Ways to Support
    • Membership Services
    • Gifts in Wills
  • Help Animals
    • Urgent Alerts
    • Our Campaigns
    • Action Team
    • Activist Guide
    • Get Active Online
    • Leaflets & Stickers
  • News
    • Features
    • Videos
    • Adoptable Animals
    • Rescue Stories
  • Investigations
    • Investigations & Rescue Fund
    • Report Cruelty to Animals
  • Animal Rights Issues
    • Animals Used for Experimentation
    • Food
    • Clothing
    • Entertainment
    • Companion Animals
    • Wildlife
  • Living
    • Living 101
    • Personal Care & Fashion
    • Food & Health
    • Recipes
    • Parents
    • Humane Home
    • Entertainment
    • Animal Companions
  • Students
    • peta2
    • PETA Kids
    • TeachKind
  • Shop
    • PETA SHOP
    • Cruelty-Free Database
    • Literature
    • PETA Shopping Guide
    • PETA-Approved Vegan
    • PETA Presents
  • About
    • Our Story
    • Our Views
    • Victories
    • Milestones
    • Volunteer
    • Work at PETA
    • Intern
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
    • PETA Global
  • Donate Now
    • Donate Now
    • Vanguard Society
    • ‘In Honor of’ and Memorial Gifts
    • More Ways to Support
    • Membership Services
    • Gifts in Wills
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Features
  4. /
  5. PETA Foundation Legal
  6. /
  7. Animal Law Case Summaries From the PETA Foundation
  8. /
  9. Bill of Attainder Case Summary
Barn owl on green background
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Join Us
  • Contact Us
  • Case Summaries

Bill of Attainder Case Summary

Case Name: 30 barn owls confined at Johns Hopkins University, by and through their next friends, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc., Martin Wasserman, Lana Weidgenant, and Evanna Lynch v. Vilsack, et al.
Index Number: 1:21-cv-00968-TSC
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia


In April 2021, PETA Foundation lawyers and local counsel filed a first-of-its-kind lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Administrator Kevin Shea on behalf of 30 barn owls being used in deadly brain experiments at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). The lawsuit alleged that the taxpayer-funded tests were allowed because of an unconstitutional law and should never have been permitted under the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA). PETA participated in the lawsuit as one of a number of “next friends” to the barn owls and was joined by Evanna Lynch, an award-winning animal welfare activist and actor who starred in the Harry Potter film franchise; Martin Wasserman, M.D., a former Maryland secretary of health and mental hygiene; and Lana Weidgenant, an animal rights and climate justice activist who was then a senior at JHU.

A Novel Lawsuit Takes Shape Under the Bill of Attainder Clause

The lawsuit took aim at the Helms Amendment to the AWA, which was drafted by notorious civil rights opponent Sen. Jesse Helms in 2002. The Helms Amendment excludes birds, rats, and mice used in experiments from the same minimal protections afforded to other species under the AWA.

The lawsuit was premised on the argument that because the absence of federal protections meant that the barn owls had no protection from being killed at the end of the torturous experiments, the Helms Amendment acts as their death sentence. Because of the Helms Amendment, student experimenters—whose trial and error during invasive procedures on the owls are chalked up to being part of the “learning process”—could operate on the birds without having to adhere to the protections guaranteed by the AWA. Likewise, during these tests, experimenters could insert electrodes into the birds’ heads and restrain them so that they couldn’t move. The owls could then be bombarded with jarring sounds and images. When their brains were damaged beyond use, the birds could be killed regardless of whether doing so would be “humane” under the AWA.

As PETA’s lawsuit pointed out, the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits congressionally imposed death sentences via the Bill of Attainder Clause. Helms reinforced that the goal of his amendment was to impose an unconstitutional death sentence during a sarcastic speech on the Senate floor in which he urged his fellow senators to “deliver a richly deserved rebuke” to the “so-called ‘animal rights’ crowd” and compared the animals he singled out to “food for reptiles” who merit “extermination.”

The lawsuit asked for the Helms Amendment to be abolished and for the federal government to require rigorous inspections and humane treatment of the owls in JHU’s laboratory—and the tens of millions of other birds, mice, and additional unfairly exempted animals used in laboratories across the country.

Parties File Briefs After a Motion to Dismiss

In August 2021, PETA Foundation counsel filed a more than 13,000-word brief in the district court in response to the federal government’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The brief explained that these barn owls presented a logical case for application of the Bill of Attainder Clause.

The barn owls—unlike corporations that challenge alleged bills of attainder that may deny them access to regulatory benefits or subsidies—would be killed. And according to precedent—both case law and evidence cited from the Constitutional Convention—the “starting point” in deciding whether an act inflicts punishment under the Bill of Attainder Clause is whether it inflicts classic forms of punishment, such as imprisonment or death. Additional precedent counseled that laws like the Helms Amendment are paradigmatic bills of attainder because they create “easily ascertainable” groups based on immutable characteristics providing “no escape” to members. Other precedent observed that bill of attainder protections are particularly salient in the context of vulnerable groups.

Recognizing the implications of the lawsuit, JHU and various animal experimentation trade groups filed a rare amicus brief with the district court. In their brief, amici tried to defend the meager non-AWA guidelines that govern experiments. This gave PETA Foundation lawyers the opportunity to argue that alternative guidelines published by the National Institutes of Health and voluntary accreditation depend on self-evaluation and impose no legal consequences for failure to comply.

The court dismissed the lawsuit in February 2022 for “lack of standing,” deciding that nonhuman animals aren’t considered “persons” and opining that PETA and others therefore don’t have “next friend” standing.

PETA Foundation Lawyers Continue Working to Save the Barn Owls

PETA Foundation lawyers also pursued administrative attempts to rescue these owls. Under Maryland law, experimenters needed a “scientific collecting” permit to possess, use, and kill the owls. PETA eventually determined that experimenters lacked these permits between 2015 and 2018 and that the permits they did have subsequently didn’t grant permission for owls to be killed—seemingly making these experiments illegal. Months of back and forth with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources resulted in a brief period in spring 2022 in which the permits were revoked. PETA is still fighting to have action taken over the fact that these experiments were apparently conducted illegally for years. A June 2022 PETA complaint still hasn’t been acted upon, and federal grants funding the experiments were recently renewed.


← Previous
Return to Home
Next →
GET PETA UPDATES
Stay up to date on the latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your inbox!
Sign me up for the following e-mail:
Current subscribers: You will continue to receive e-mails unless you explicitly opt out here.

By submitting this form, you’re acknowledging that you have read and agree to our privacy policy and agree to receive e-mails from us.

Get the Latest Tips—Right in Your Inbox
We’ll e-mail you weekly with the latest in vegan recipes, fashion, and more!
Sign me up for the following e-mail:
Current subscribers: You will continue to receive e-mails unless you explicitly opt out here.

By submitting this form, you’re acknowledging that you have read and agree to our privacy policy and agree to receive e-mails from us.

Read More

“Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, and going to circuses and zoos. We never considered the impact of these actions on the animals involved. For whatever reason, you are now asking the question: Why should animals have rights?”

— Ingrid Newkirk, PETA President and co-author of Animalkind

Read More
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
501 Front St., Norfolk, VA 23510
757-622-PETA (7382)
757-622-0457 (fax)
PETA is a nonprofit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) corporation (tax ID number 52-1218336). CFC #11651

About PETA

  • Our Story
  • Careers
  • Why Animal Rights?
  • Victories
  • Volunteer
  • PETA Prime
  • Sign Up for E-Mails
  • Join PETA’s Text List
  • Contact PETA
  • International Publications

Help Animals

  • Urgent Alerts
  • Our Campaigns
  • Join the Action Team
  • For Students
  • For Teachers

For Media

  • Media Center
  • News Releases
  • PSAs
  • For Media: Order PSAs
  • Contact Media Team

Support PETA

  • Donate Now
  • Become a Member
  • Make a Monthly Gift
  • Make a Memorial Gift
  • Make an Honorary Gift
  • Make a Stock Gift
  • Gifts in Wills
  • What Is the Vanguard Society?
  • Membership Services
  • Gift Memberships
  • More Ways

International Sites

  • PETA U.K.
  • PETA France
  • PETA Germany
  • PETA Netherlands
  • PETA Switzerland
  • PETA India
  • PETA Australia
  • PETA Asia
  • 亚洲善待动物组织
  • PETA Latino
  • © 2025 PETA | Read Our Full Policy
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Contest Terms & Conditions
  • Disclaimer
  • Texting Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Report Website Abuse

Click here to text WEGMANS to 73822 to tell Wegmans Food Markets to stop funding an institute that paid experimenters to force-feed animals parasite-infested feces!

Terms for automated texts/calls from PETA: http://peta.vg/txt. Text STOP to end, HELP for more info. Msg/data rates may apply. U.S. only.

✕Close