Skip to Main Content
Animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way.

Historic News in Sheep Case

Written by PETA | June 3, 2010

sheep

It’s not often that we use the word “great” to describe anything involving vivisectors, but a recent development involving a petition filed by PETA and Madison-based Alliance for Animals against sheep experimenters at University of Wisconsin (UW)–Madison is just that: Circuit Court Judge Amy Smith has determined that nine individuals may face criminal penalties for conducting excruciating and deadly decompression experiments on sheep.

You might remember that PETA and Alliance for Animals joined forces to petition for prosecution after a district attorney shrugged off his own findings that UW-Madison had indeed violated state law using decompression to kill sheep. The D.A. apparently decided that it wasn’t worth his time and effort to pursue charges.

After reviewing our petition, Judge Smith decided that animal experimenters are not above the law, determining “that probable cause exists to conclude that certain named individuals … violated [a state law prohibiting the use of decompression to kill animals], either directly or as party to a crime.” That means that both the vivisectors and those who assisted them with their experiments may face criminal or civil prosecution. In her 24-page decision, Judge Smith also wrote, “[T]he University has apparently engaged in behavior resulting in the above-described animal deaths for years,” and noted that “it may well continue to decompress animals to death contrary to law, unless I take action.” She has appointed a special prosecutor to determine whether to bring charges against the nine UW-Madison employees.

Considering that this is possibly the second time that a judge has found probable cause for criminal charges—the first was PETA’s landmark Silver Spring Monkeys case—it’s no wonder that news outlets such as the Wall Street Journal and others are buzzing about this important development.

We’ll keep you in the loop on future developments as they happen, but we—and animals—are depending your efforts to help stop animal experimentation.

Written by Karin Bennett

Related Posts

Respond

Comments

Post a Comment

If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient as it may take some time to publish or may require moderation.

By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our collection, storage, use, and disclosure of your personal info in accordance with our privacy policy as well as to receiving e-mails from us.

  • angelica monteiro says:

    Ainda bem que a PETA existe. Parabéns pelo trabalho em defesa dos dfireitos dos animais. Contem comigo sempre.

  • M. Lolliet says:

    Why do we even test on animals? Their systems are a little different. Like chocolate for example.We can eat it but it is poison to animals.

  • Lois says:

    This is one more small step in the direction of ending vivisection completely. It is outdated and unnecessary.

  • Melinda says:

    Yeah for animals!!! Animal experimenters beware your deeds will not go unpunished. You’ll be found out and will face criminal penalties.

  • indycar01 says:

    help stop animal research and there charities visit reform march of dimes.org learn how charities misspend research dollars mrmcmed.org animal research has NEVER been validated. “work on prevention of polio was LONG DELAYED by an erroneous conception of the nature of the human disease based on MISLEADING experimental models of the disease in monkeys” albert sabin m.d. during a 1984 house subcommittee. cancer “if curing mouse cancers were enough. we would have cured cancer IN THE 60S” dr.donald morton john wayne cancer institute. does your charity fund animal research? visit humaneseal.org ps “animal studies are done for LEGAL REASONS and not for scientific reasons. the predictive value of such studies for man is MEANINGLESS” 1964 james gallagher medical director of lederle laboratories uk.

Connect With PETA

Subscribe