Skip to Main Content
Animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way.

Custody Battle for Surviving Ohio Animals

Written by PETA | October 28, 2011
© Peter Malsbury | iStockphoto.com

Less than two weeks after four dozen wild and exotic animals were shot to death in Zanesville, Ohio, there’s still somebody out there who didn’t get the message that privately owning exotic animals is a recipe for disaster—and that somebody is Marian Thompson, the wife of the man who owned (and released) all the animals in the first place. Ms. Thompson is demanding that four of the six survivors—a grizzly bear and three leopards—in temporary quarantine at the Columbus Zoo, be returned to her immediately.

PETA has sent urgent letters to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the Muskingum County prosecutor imploring them not to return the animals until investigations into whether the animals were harmed or harassed in violation of the Endangered Species Act and/or Ohio’s anti-cruelty laws are conducted. It appears that the animals may have been obtained without proper permits in the first place and that they were kept in filthy conditions with insufficient food, water, and/or shade—all violations of the law. On top of it, public records indicate that there are nearly $70,000 in liens hanging over Ms. Thompson’s head, leaving her ill-equipped to properly take care of the animals.

While we continue to fight to keep the survivors safe, you can help by e-mailing the Ohio Department of Natural Resources to politely urge the agency to exercise its authority to implement emergency regulations to prohibit the keeping of exotic and wild animals.

 

Written by Amanda Schinke

Related Posts

Respond

Comments

Post a Comment

If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient as it may take some time to publish or may require moderation.

By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our collection, storage, use, and disclosure of your personal info in accordance with our privacy policy as well as to receiving e-mails from us.

  • Judy Boone says:

    This woman and her husband should NEVER have had these animals do not give them back

  • Felicity Caulfield says:

    Please under no circumstances return these animals to inhumane conditions and an uncertain future.

  • Susan T says:

    It would be the ultimate act of idiocy by a regulatory agency to return these magnificent animals to private citizen who has insufficient income and expertise to properly care for them. Isn’t it enough that her pyschotic husband sealed their doom when he opened their cage doors. Pathetically sad he wasn’t satisfied to simply kill himself. Giving these creatures back to this woman would be a travesty. Please! Find a suitable sanctuary where they might live out their lives as close to their natural habitats as possible.

  • Judy says:

    She needs those animals as much as I do, and, I don’t! Why does she want them anyway? For their hide? Very weird. The Columbus Zoo should stick to its guns and refuse to return them to her.