Following Euthanasia of Animals as Part of School's COVID-19 Response Plans, Group Questions Why Non-Essential Experiments Were Ever Conducted or Funded by Taxpayers
For Immediate Release:
September 9, 2020
Amanda Tumbleson 202-483-7382
Minneapolis – Today, PETA sent a letter to the state legislative auditor urging an audit of the use of public money, personnel, property, equipment, and space by the University of Minnesota (U of M) for animal experiments deemed non-essential during the COVID-19 pandemic. This apparently led to the euthanasia of animals in the school’s laboratories.
In its letter, PETA notes that in the last fiscal year, the university received $674 million in state appropriations, some of which may have gone toward funding animal experiments that were ultimately postponed or canceled. In March, U of M urged its experimenters to “euthanize [animals] as soon as [their] data is collected,” “review current animals … and consider euthanasia if no longer needed,” and mark “the 20% of ‘priority save’ cages.” These directives likely led to the killing of hundreds or more animals the school deemed extraneous. PETA questions why state funds were wasted on experiments considered non-essential.
“The University of Minnesota’s experiments on animals were undoubtedly cruel, and apparently not even the school can justify them,” says PETA Vice President Shalin Gala. “PETA is calling on state officials to follow the money and prevent taxpayer waste—and animal suffering—in laboratories that should never have received funding in the first place.”
Numerous published studies have shown that animal experimentation wastes resources and lives, as more than 90% of basic scientific research—much of it involving animal experimentation—fails to lead to treatments for humans. (Please read under “Lack of benefit for humans” here.) And 95% of new medications that are found to be safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials.