The New York Times Shines a Spotlight on the Dark Secrets of ‘Humane Meat’

Published by PETA Staff.
< 1 min read

Since meat companies started slapping happy, feel-good “humane” labels on animal flesh, animal advocates have been crying foul. And this week, The New York Times confirmed what we’ve been saying all along: The labels “mislead shoppers, who probably know little or nothing about the small number of organizations that create most of them.”

The Times found that companies can still label meat “humane” even if the animals endured crowding, continuous darkness, tail-docking, branding, beak slicing, and other cruel practices. It also notes that “humane” standards are often “similar to those [already] used in the meat industry” in general.

Read the full article here, and help spread the word that the only humane meal is a vegan one.

JOIN US
Get urgent alerts, breaking animals rights news, and easy ways to take action for animals!
PETA bunny
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
At least one of the following fields is required.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Untitled

Get the Latest Tips—Right in Your Inbox
We’ll e-mail you weekly with the latest in vegan recipes, fashion, and more!

By submitting this form, you’re acknowledging that you have read and agree to our privacy policy and agree to receive e-mails from us.