PETA's Animal Times
Features
Sheryl Lee Takes a Swipe at Animal Acts
Blood on His Hands
Kicked, Cursed, and Butchered Alive
Please Don't Eat Babe
How to Be Your Dog's Best Friend
The African Slave Trade
Catch-and-Release Isn't Kind
Frightened to Death
Actions & Updates
Purrs & Grrrs

If you think catch-and-release is “sporting,” think again. Comedian Ellen DeGeneres’ analogy is to run some pedestrians down with your car. When they get up and brush themselves off, roll down the window and say, “OK, you can go now. I just wanted to see if I could hit ya!” Never mind that they might be suffering injuries to their fins, or limbs, and internal organs—that’s part of the “fun,” right?

Anglers say catch-and-release fishing is a harmless pastime that fosters an appreciation of the outdoors, helps conserve fish populations, brings families together...yada, yada, yada. We say it’s cruel. Here’s what else anglers are saying--and why we don’t buy their lines.

“Catch-and-release fishing isn’t nearly as cruel as hunting.”

Actually, fishing may be worse. In catch-and-release, the same fish can be hooked again and again—causing them ever more injuries and pain.

Trout Unlimited’s Charles Gauvin admits, “It is possible to go to places like the South Platte in Colorado and the San Juan in New Mexico where the fish are battered, their lips are bruised from being caught so many times.” Adds U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologist Mike Buntjer, “I’ve seen fish with their maxillaries [lips] torn off, eyes missing and with flies and hooks stuck all over them.”

Being hooked hurts!
Fish have sensitive nerve endings in their lips and mouths. And they begin to die slowly of suffocation the moment they are pulled from the water. Says Dr. Donald Broom, animal welfare advisor to the British government, “The scientific literature is quite clear. Anatomically, physiologically and biologically, the pain system in fish is virtually the same as in birds and mammals....In animal welfare terms, you have to put fishing in the same category as hunting.”

“If fish are hurt when they’re hooked, why do they keep biting?”

Anglers go to great lengths to hide their hooks with bait and lures, and even the most injured animals will continue to seek out food and fight to stay alive.

“At least the fish don’t die.”

Wanna bet? Anglers who “play” fish to the brink of exhaustion are wishful thinkers if they believe their prey will swim away unharmed. Prolonged exertion causes lactic acid to build up in fish’s bodies—which causes their muscle cells to start decomposing from lack of oxygen—and greatly decreases their chances of surviving.

A Canadian study found that removing exhausted fish from the water before releasing them also ups the risk: Rainbow trout exposed to the air for 30 seconds had a 27% mortality rate; those out of water for 60 seconds, a 72% rate. That’s because water provides fish with oxygen and helps to dissipate the high levels of lactic acid caused by struggling on the end of a hook.

Many other factors can affect mortality, too. Bass, walleyes and other fish caught in deep waters can die from inflated air bladders. Cuts from fishing line, wounds from hooks and boat-side injuries all decrease fish’s chances of survival. So does catching fish with bait. Fish who bite bait often swallow the hooks, resulting in internal injuries. Or the hooks become encysted, making the fish more susceptible to deadly viral infections.

“If catch-and-release fishing is so bad, it wouldn’t be practiced at tournaments.”

Anglers may not realize the extent of the problem. The Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation found that the fish mortality rate at catch-and-release tournaments can be as high as 43% during summer months, when water temperatures are warmer.

“But,” says the department’s report, “participants and contest organizers would have seldom seen dead bass to give them indications that tournament-related mortality was occurring,” because weakened fish are eaten by turtles and other animals, or they die of their injuries several days after anglers have packed up and gone home.

Catch our Web site, www.NoFishing.net.

“Releasing a mortally wounded fish isn’t any different than shooting an elk and not recovering it.”
—Outdoors columnist Paul Vang

One evening, driving into Philadelphia at sunset, I stopped my car beside the Schuylkill River. Two men were fishing, but I was glad to note they weren’t catching anything. Or, anyone, I should say, for a fish is not a thing. Then, as dusk fell, I saw one of the men wrestling with what looked to be an enormously long fish. He had caught an eel.

Walking up, I saw that a five-pronged metal gaff, with separate sets of barbed hooks attached to each prong, was embedded in the eel’s throat. As the animal wriggled, the man pulled and twisted at the gaff but succeeded only in making a bloody mess. I offered to hold the eel still because the procedure was going so painfully slow.

I wrapped a towel around the eel, then held the long body still. That allowed the man to use both hands, but that didn’t work, either.

Suddenly, the man lost patience and yanked hard on the gaff. The eel and I made eye contact at the very moment his throat was pulled out of his mouth.

There was no mistaking the look on the eel’s face: horror, fear, shock and pain.

It has been years, but I still can’t shake that look. The eel had been hurt terribly and then killed for “sport.” The deed had been carried out not in secret, down a dark alley, but in a public place. It had happened a million times before, and it would happen as many times again. When anyone asks me why PETA objects to fishing, I remember that eel.

 

 

PETA
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
501 Front St., Norfolk, VA 23510; 757-622-PETA