Q. What does the EPA do when evidence shows that workers exposed to atrazine on the job get cancer?
They ignore the human data and force-feed the pesticide to animals.
They then conclude that it is “not likely” to cause cancer in humans
because the animal test results are “not relevant.”
Confused? We are, too. PETA, astounded yet
again by the EPA’s idiocy and lack of common sense, decided to put its
own super-computer to work to try and unravel the scientific methodology
underlying the EPA’s risk-assessment procedures. We punched in the
appropriate data, and here’s what we found:
Click here to read PETA’s letter revealing our “findings” to EPA Administrator Christie Whitman.
Click here to find out more about the EPA’s pointless animal-testing programs and what you can do to help stop them.
Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, and going to circuses and zoos. We never considered the impact of these actions on the animals involved. For whatever reason, you are now asking the question: Why should animals have rights? Read more.