Return to PETA.org
Help End the Suffering of Dogs Used in the Iditarod
Resources
Photos
Commentary
HelpSledDogs.org
CompassionateTraveler.org
Get Active
Write to Sponsors
Choose the "Ikidarod"
Subscribe to E-News
Become a Member

There’s Nothing Sporting About Cruelty

Greg Cote, sports columnist for The Miami Herald, wrote last March about the Iditarod, “The bizarre competition involves 65 ‘mushers,’ drivers along for the ride as their slaves—16 dog teams, at least at the start—do the hard labor, at times encouraged by their masters’ whips.” He calls the race “a grotesque shame masquerading as sport” and explains that the abuse of the dogs constitutes a violation of cruelty-to-animals statutes across the United States.

USA Today sports columnist Jon Saraceno, who refers to the Iditarod as “Ihurtadog,” has called it an embarrassment, an outrage, and “a travesty of grueling proportions.” In an article published during the 2001 race, Saraceno wrote, “It’s really shameful marketing carried out on the backs of defenseless animals.” He also stated, “Injury and death are Iditarod partners.”

Fox sportscaster Jim Rome has termed the Iditarod the “I-killed-a-dog sled race” and pointed out in an article following the completion of last year’s race that two dogs died during the race and several others were removed from the race because of injuries, including a group of dogs who had been mangled by a snow-making machine.

George Diaz, sports columnist for the Orlando Sentinel, said of the Iditarod in a March 2000 article, “Although the fluff coverage in the Anchorage Daily News promotes the Iditarod as ‘Alaska’s great race,’ it is nothing more than a barbaric ritual that gives Alaskan cowboys a license to kill.”

In an article entitled “Iditarod’s Bone of Contention Repels Some Marketers,” Bruce Horowitz of USA Today calls the Iditarod a “public relations minefield.”

More »

Return to PETA.org