Skip to Main Content
Animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way.

It’s a Win-Win for PETA and the EPA

Written by PETA | October 6, 2009

Several years ago, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) decided to tackle the issue of determining the safety of nanomaterials—teeny-tiny particles that measure less than one-tenth of a micrometer (even smaller than the brain of the average Michael Vick fan) As soon as we learned about this initiative, our staff scientists began communicating with the EPA, urging the agency to use the most modern and sophisticated testing methods instead of automatically relying on archaic animal tests, as government agencies historically have, basically for no better reason than “we’ve always done it that way.”

Last week, our scientists’ hard work paid off: The EPA issued its final “Nanomaterials Research Strategy,” and it incorporates many of PETA’s recommendations. While the original draft still relied heavily on animal tests, the final plan takes full advantage of non-animal test methods. This will greatly reduce the number of animals killed in tests assessing the toxicity of nanomaterials.

 

molvray / CC
mouse

 

Just as important, the research strategy reiterates the principles outlined in the strategic plan the EPA released this spring, which calls for identifying and using non-animal testing methods that will ultimately replace all animal tests for nanomaterials.

This is a win-win for PETA, animals, and the EPA. Oh, and the public wins, too, because reducing the use of animals in assessing the toxicity of nanomaterials also improves the agency’s ability to assess hazards to humans.

Written by Alisa Mullins

Related Posts

Respond

Comments

Post a Comment

If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient as it may take some time to publish or may require moderation.

By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our collection, storage, use, and disclosure of your personal info in accordance with our privacy policy as well as to receiving e-mails from us.

  • KELLY says:

    i SAW A NEWS CLIP OF A BREEDING KENNEL IN PUERTO RICO WHERE THESE MONKEYS WERE BEING TORTURED. THANK GOD CNN RAN THE CLIP. IT WAS HORRIFIC TO SAY THE LEAST. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THE PLACE HAS BEEN CLOSED DOWN AND THE PEOPLE RUNNING IT OUT. I WOULD ALSO LIKE AN UPDATE REGARDING THESE MONKEYS AND IF THEY ARE IN A BETTER SAFER PLACE. WE HAVE ALOT OF SICK PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD AND PEOPLE WHO ABUSE ANIMALS ARE THE WORST. IF I COULD FLY THERE TO CLOSE THESE TYPE OF SICK PLACES DOWN BELIEVE ME I WOULD BE THERE IN A MINUTE. THANK YOU KELLY

  • Rex's Mom says:

    If the EPA is so great all of a sudden why are they poisoning prairie dogs? I just received and email from the Defenders of Wildlife who are saying this.

  • Tricia says:

    It’s about time! This is wonderful news!

  • Brien Comerford says:

    This is a momentous step in the right direction and hopefully the end of brutal animal vivisection and research is imminent.