Skip to Main Content

Charlotte Ross’ Skin Isn’t Indecent

Written by PETA | January 10, 2011

A New York court saved NYPD Blue some green today by nullifying a $1.2 million fine that the Federal Communications Commission handed to ABC after the network aired an episode in which Charlotte Ross bared her backside. The court said that it wasn’t “per se indecent.” We agree. Baring one’s buns isn’t nearly as indecent as, say, bludgeoning bunnies for their fur.

Charlotte, who now has a recurring role alongside Lea Michele, Jane Lynch, and other PETA pals on the Fox hit Glee, showed that she’d rather bare her skin than wear animals’ skins in this ad she did for PETA while she was filming NYPD Blue. Pretty decent of her, eh?

Written by Michelle Sherrow

Related Posts

Respond

Comments

Post a Comment

If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient as it may take some time to publish or may require moderation.

By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our collection, storage, use, and disclosure of your personal info in accordance with our privacy policy as well as to receiving e-mails from us.

Connect With PETA

Subscribe