Animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way.

How Can a Beheaded Corpse Be Sexy?

Written by PETA | September 30, 2011

In Wednesday’s New York Times dining section, someone thought it would be a riot to take the decapitated, amputated, defeathered corpse of a chicken and prop the body up in a sexually suggestive “come hither” pose.

PETA President Ingrid E. Newkirk was not amused. “When I saw it, I just couldn’t believe that an editor of The New York Times would find it acceptable,” she told The Atlantic Wire. “It’s downright offensive, not just to people who care about animals but to anyone. It’s a plucked, beheaded, young chicken …. [That's] necrophilia. It’s not amusing. It’s just sick.”


Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

Some have suggested that PETA, which has never shied away from using nudity to make a point, is in no position to cast stones. Excuse me? A key difference between PETA’s ads and the New York Times‘ photo is that our models are willing participants who are still very much alive.

Is it a sign of how desensitized our society has become to the animals who are violently slaughtered for food that someone would think it a “sexy” joke to pose a young chicken—a baby, really, as chickens are slaughtered at 6 to 8 weeks old—like the star of a lingerie commercial. But picture in this bird’s place the decapitated, amputated, skinned corpse of a puppy or a kitten. Would anybody be laughing—or licking their chops? Doubt it.

 

What do you think of the New York Times’ sexually suggestive chicken photo?

 

 

Written by Alisa Mullins

Related Posts

Respond

Comments

Post a Comment

If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient as it may take some time to publish or may require moderation.

By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our collection, storage, use, and disclosure of your personal info in accordance with our privacy policy as well as to receiving e-mails from us.

Connect With PETA

Subscribe