That’s our number of the day, boys and girls. Which of the following adds up to 29 million?
- The amount, in pounds, paid for a rare pink diamond recently sold at auction in the U.K.
- The number of people who voted for President Obama in 2008 but didn’t vote in the 2010 midterm elections
- The number of pounds of antibiotics fed to farmed animals last year.
- The number of people projected to use video calling by 2015.
- All of the above.
If you chose “5,” you may be watching too much of the Count (or maybe you just cheated and Googled “29 million”), but you would also be correct.
Of course, the notable fact for our purposes is that 29 million pounds of antibiotics are fed to animals on farms. Quick refresher for those of you who are new to the Files: Animals are routinely fed antibiotics in order to promote growth and keep them alive long enough in filthy, miserable factory-farm conditions to be poked and prodded to slaughter.
This is problematic for those of us who aren’t making heaps of money off abused animals’ backs, because the overuse of antibiotics leads to the development of antibiotic-resistant “superbugs,” which then proceed to eat our flesh, ravage our lungs, poison our blood, and engage in other nasty, life-threatening behavior.
This is the first time that the government has even attempted to tabulate the staggering amounts of antibiotics fed to animals. One has to wonder what took it so long—although, as nutrition professor and author Marion Nestle points out, “[I]t is a sign that the FDA is taking steps to address this serious public health problem.”
What do you say we check back at this time next year to see how much that number has gone up or down?
Written by Alisa Mullins
If your comment doesn't appear right away, please be patient as it may take some time to publish or may require moderation.