|

My dog Ms. Bea was a rescued mixed shepherd, every bit as large and imposing as the grande dame in the old Marx Brothers movies. She hated joggers (they made her feel fat) and children (too noisy) and loved coming to work with me every day when I ran the District of Columbia animal shelter.
Ms. Bea had several important jobs at the pound. One of them was to rise from her bed at the front desk and greet frightened dogs who were being cast off by their owners. When they saw her moving toward them with such self-assurance, obviously well fed, totally at home and happy as a clam, they stopped shaking and began wagging their tails.
Ms. Bea worked long hours and loved every minute. She ate what we ateIndian take-out was her favoriteand she rode the truck into the best and the most troubled neighborhoods, looking out the window at them all. I loved her very much.
She only fell down on the job once, but I couldnt blame her because by that time, she was very old, had lost her hearing and was inclined to nap a lot. One very late winter night, some men decided to mug me as I was getting back into my van. It was only because I immediately saw them comingone with a tire iron in his handand because I used to run the heater for Ms. Bea with an extra key in the ignition, that I escaped. Oblivious to the commotion, Ms. Bea slept through it. I never told her about the incident. It would have been a terrible blow.
Ms. Bea was 17 years old when she died. I still think of her often, a dignified old girl who knew she looked silly when she carried her green plastic frog in her mouth, a dear friend and loving companion. When people ask me how anyone can justify breaking into labs and stealing the animals, all I know is that if anyone had Ms. Bea on the dissection table, Id be through that door in a minute, lock me up if you will.
Right or Wrong?
Here are some rebuttals to vivisectors favorite arguments:
We must observe the complex interactions of cells, tissues and organs.
Yes, in human beings, not by taking healthy animals from different species, artificially inducing a condition, and then trying to apply the results to us. Interactions vary enormously from species to species. For example, penicillin kills guinea pigs, aspirin kills cats, and morphine, a depressant in humans, stimulates horses.
Although tested as safe on animals, many drugsincluding phenactin, E-Ferol, Oraflex, Zomax, Suprol, and Selacrynhad to be taken off the market after causing death or illness in thousands of people. More than half the drugs the Food and Drug Administration approved between 1976 and 1985 had to be withdrawn or relabeled because of serious side effects.
Every major medical advance came from animal experiments.
Just because animals were used doesnt mean they had to be used or that primitive techniques used in 1899 are valid in 1999! Medical historians write that improved nutrition, sanitation and other lifestyle factors are responsible for the decline in deaths since 1900 from the 10 most common infectious diseases. The most important advances in health have come from human studies, e.g., learning the connection between smoking and cancer, the development of x-rays and the isolation of the AIDS virus.
Theres no substitute.
Human clinical and epidemiological studies, cadavers, computer simulators and human cell cultures are more reliable, more precise, less expensive and more humane than animal tests. Sounds more like an improvement than a substitute! As Gordon Baxter, cofounder of Pharmagene Laboratoriesa company that uses only human tissues and computers to develop and test drugssays, If you have information on human genes, whats the point of going back to animals?
|
|
Ms. Bea is my litmus test of whether it is right to do things to animals. Ms. Bea was not a thing. She had gender, individuality, life and love and understanding inside her. No one could ever convince me that it would have been all right to burn her or sink electrodes into her head and shock hernot to save me, my child, or my other dog, if that were the case, and I believe it is never the case. It wouldnt have been right.
They are all Ms. Bea, in their own way, arent they? Even the smallest of them, the ugliest or weirdest of them.
I remember thinking exactly that when I toured the National Institutes of Healths (NIHs) Poolesville Primate Laboratory one morning.
Entering a barren room in a seemingly endless corridor of barren white-washed rooms, I found a baboon. I actually heard him first because he was banging his head so loudly against the solid steel sides of his cage.
In this totally sterile, dull, windowless environment, he was so alive and so gaudy, almost surreal: a huge hydramus baboon, the size of a small man. He had a long dog snout that looked as if he had painted it with crazy red and pink and white and grey stripes. His long multicolored hair stood out from his body like a big colorful cloak. You could imagine him on his way to a costume party.
How must he have felt when aliens snatched him from his jungle and transported him to this cold lonely world to die in a steel cage? Most primates avoid making eye contact, yet this baboon stared straight at me. His eyes were filled not with despair, as one might expect, but with deep loathing.
I made enquiries and my questions became embarrassing for NIH. It transpired that the baboon and several others in his group had been forgotten. Originally shipped to the U.S. from Russia, they had been used for eight years in a cancer study. The study had been casually abandoned when the principal investigator had taken a job in another state. The baboons would have been hosed down in their metal boxes and fed monkey biscuits until the day they died. I pushed for a resolution. Eventually NIH told me it had found no further use for the animals and had killed them. I hoped it was truewhat an indictment of societys treatment of animals.
My regular visits to NIHs primate complex made the researchers there stop and think about the nastier aspects of their work, rather than simply conduct business as usual. I knew that each one had the potential to have a change of heart and at every opportunity I reminded them that it is possible to find other ways to make a living.
Dr. Roger Ulrich did. For years, he had experimented on monkeys and received many professional awards and honors for his hideously cruel experiments, using monkeys and rats to study the relationship between pain and aggression. In one experiment, he used electric shocks intense enough to cause paralysis. One group of rats could not stand even half this intensity and several died.
One day, Dr. Ulrich wrote this to the American Psychological Association: When I was asked why I conducted these experiments, I used to say it was because I wanted to help society solve its problems of mental illness, crime, retardation, drug abuse, child abuse, unemployment, marital unhappiness, alcoholism, over-smoking, over-eating...even war! Although, after I got into this line of work, I discovered that the results of my work did not seem to justify its continuance. I began to wonder if perhaps financial rewards, professional prestige, the opportunity to travel, etc., were the maintaining factors and if we of the scientific community, supported by our bureaucratic and legislative systems, were actually part of the whole problem.
One spring I was asked by a colleague, Dr. Ulrich, what is the most innovative thing that youve done professionally over the past year? I replied, Dear Dave, Ive finally stopped torturing animals.
Excerpted from Ingrid Newkirks new book,
You Can Save the Animals:
251 Simple Ways to Stop Thoughtless Cruelty
(1999, Prima Publishing).
|